Latrobe girls make early playoff exit
Latrobe's girls basketball season is over, but it was fun while it lasted — even if winning games was a challenge all year for the Wildcats.
“We were back in the playoffs,” coach Greg Fenton said after a 54-39 loss to Baldwin in a WPIAL Class AAAA preliminary-round game Friday night at Penn-Trafford, extending the Wildcats' losing streak to six. “It's been awhile. I'm very proud of the girls we have here. They saw what it was all about.”
Nikki Corcoran scored 15 points to lead Baldwin (11-11), which advanced to a first-round game Tuesday against second-seeded North Allegheny.
Mandi Johnston and Amanda Larkin added 12 points each for the Highlanders.
“Baldwin is a good basketball team,” Fenton said. “They were certainly a better team than us tonight.”
Latrobe's starting lineup consisted entirely of underclass players. Freshman Rachael Kollar led the Wildcats (9-14) with 10 points.
“Two juniors, three sophomores and one freshman,” Fenton said. “We have our entire starting lineup back.”
Latrobe, which was playing in its first postseason game in five years, struggled from the start, falling behind after the first quarter, 19-10.
Baldwin, which competes in Section 4 alongside such teams as top-seeded Mt. Lebanon and third-seeded Bethel Park, built leads of 25-14 at halftime and 42-27 after the third quarter and coasted to the victory.
It was the Highlanders' second victory in a row after upsetting Bethel Park in their final regular-season game.
“We've had some moments this season. This team is playing well now, although we started slowly tonight,” Baldwin coach Gavin Prosser said. “We missed our first five shots, but once the girls saw one go through the nets, we got rid of our jitters.”
Dave Mackall is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at firstname.lastname@example.org .
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.