Share This Page

Monessen ousts S. Academy, 60-52

| Saturday, Feb. 16, 2013, 12:36 a.m.
Monessen's #2 Javon Brown pass ball past Sewickley Academy's #4 J. P. Bowell at Keystone Oaks High School. Jim Ference | The Valley Independet

Any time two successful coaches face off, there is bound to be a game of chess and that was the case Friday night in a WPIAL Class A first round game at Keystone Oaks.

After all, Monessen coach Joe Salvino and Sewickley Academy coach Win Palmer have each recorded over 500 wins in their respective illustrious careers.

Fortunately for the Greyhounds (10-13), their adjustments trumped those of the Panthers (8-13) and as a result, Monessen is moving on to the quarterfinals thanks to a 60-52 win.

The Greyhounds will now meet second-seeded Vincentian (22-1) Friday. The Royals routed Western Beaver, 106-73.

“Hitting shots early was a big key for us because they packed in their zone,” Salvino said. “We were able to get the early lead and went from there.”

In fact, seventh-seeded Monessen never trailed and the contest was only tied at the opening tip and at 2-2.

The Greyhounds went on a 9-0 run to open an 11-2 lead and they led 15-6 after the first quarter.

Junior Justice Rawlins came out on fire and scored eight of his 18 points in the opening frame on four jumpers from 12 feet and out.

“Justice was on tonight,” Salvino said with a smile. “He gives absolutely everything he has every time out.”

Monessen was in control in the second quarter, but then Sewickley junior sharpshooter Keenan Hickton found his stroke. He drained a trio of three-pointers to keep the Panthers in the game, but the Greyhounds still held a commanding 27-16 lead at the half.

The contest, which only saw each team shoot a pair of free throws each in the first half, was played a lot tighter in the third quarter.

Both teams began having foul issues and Monessen extended its lead to 41-27 after three quarters.

However, the Panthers would not go away and made a run.

They chipped away at their deficit by hitting five of six free throws in the fourth quarter, and they also hit four more three-pointers in the quarter.

Sewickly adjusted to a full court press, and Salvino countered by going small.

“They were giving us a few problems so we put an extra guard in for ball handling,” he said. “We knew they wouldn't go away and they are a really good team.”

When senior Termanini Firas hit a trey with 3:36 to go, he cut the Monessen lead to 50-45.

After a turnover on Monessen's next possession, junior Clintell Gillaspie stole the ball and scored on a layup and added another layup seconds later to put the game out of reach.

Gillaspie finished with a game-high 25 points, including 19 in the second half with 13 in the final quarter. He shared game honors of 10 rebounds with classmate Tyler Yuille.

“Clintell is just starting to scratch the surface of the player that he can be,” Salvino said. “He doesn't know the ability that he has.”

Salvino was pleased with the effort of all eight of the players who saw time.

“Guys stepped up and made plays,” he said. “All around, I am happy with the total team effort as we prepare to move on.”

Move on, Monessen does, and Salvino will prepare for his next checkmate.

NOTES: Junior Javon Brown had eight points and seven assists for Monessen ... John O'Malley added 12 points for Sewickley … Yuille added three blocks for Monessen.

Bill Hughes is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.