Young FC girls team gets respect
TribLIVE Sports Videos
As the WPIAL girls playoffs began on Tuesday, Fox Chapel head coach Meghan Meabon said the team knew it was not going to sneak up on anybody like they did earlier in the year.
That's what happens when you post an overall record of 17 -5 and a section mark of 10-2 like the Foxes did.
And the Foxes managed to record that success with a very young team.
“At the beginning of the season, if someone had said that a (WPIAL Class AAAA team that's starting two freshmen would be in the playoffs, people would have thought they were crazy,” Meabon said.
But the Foxes did it with freshmen Taylor Cohen and Kayla Slovenec starting.
They've proven themselves and they've handled the pressure of big section games,” Meabon said.
They also did it, of course, with standout Erin Mathias who averaged about 17 points per game this year.
One of the keys to having success for the Foxes in the playoffs, according to Meabon, is making adjustments when other teams are keying on stopping Mathias.
“We did a good job of that during the regular season, so we'll be prepared for what other teams will be attempting to do to take us out of our game.”
Results of the Foxes' opening playoff game against Butler were not available at press time.
Marty Stewart is a sports editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-782-2123 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.