Share This Page

Ligonier Valley High School boys move forward in District 6 playoffs

| Wednesday, Feb. 27, 2013, 5:12 p.m.
Bill Pribisco | for the Ligonier Echo
Ligonier’s Zach Yeskey takes the ball up the court in a recent game. Bill Pribisco | for the Ligonier Echo This photo was taken on 1/6/2013 by Bill Pribisco at the Ligonier Valley High School

The Ligonier Valley High School boys basketball team won its first game of the District Six playoffs, beating Penns Valley Area High School 44–41. Head coach John Berger said his team had the size advantage in the matchup and used it to move forward in the tournament.

“My guys played really well,” Berger said.” Penns Valley likes to have a slow pace in their games — they only average in the 40s ­— and they were able to do that a little bit, but our guys, we kept the tempo up as much as we could. They played pretty darn hard; they played a good game.”

Alec Bloom and Zach Yeskey both scored and rebounded in the double digits. Bloom scored 17 points and grabbed 13 rebounds. Yeskey scored 11 points and had 10 rebounds.

In the next round of the playoffs, the Rams took on second seed Penn Cambria High School. Ligonier has not played Penn Cambria yet this year, because the game where the two teams were supposed to meet during the regular season was cancelled. Berger said he was optimistic that his team had the ability to progress deeper into the tournament.

“Penn Cambria has a 6-foot-7 kid who likes to shoot 3-pointers and is very successful at it. They're very quick and athletic,” said Berger.

Peter Turcik is a freelance writer for Trib Total Media

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.