Share This Page

Sloppy Thomas Jefferson survives

| Tuesday, Feb. 19, 2013, 11:15 p.m.

Thomas Jefferson watched a lot of tape on Laurel Highlands before the two teams played in the first round of the WPIAL Class AAA playoffs.

Maybe too much.

“I'll be honest, because when we were watching film, I could see on our guys' faces that — not that we could handle them — but that they thought we were better than them,” Thomas Jefferson coach Dom DeCicco said.

“I told our coaches that I could already see (bad things) and I should have shut my mouth because it all came true. It was not a good effort on our part, but we'll take it.”

Thomas Jefferson (17-6) shot poorly from the floor, had a non-existent transition game and barely had a rebounding edge despite a more physical presence in the paint, yet somehow the Jaguars survived with a 48-41 victory over Laurel Highlands (15-7) at Gateway.

“I think it's beneficial because everyone needs a game like this coming into the playoffs,” Thomas Jefferson senior guard Zach Schademan said.

“You've got to reassure yourself and get back to your peak.”

Guard Joe Carroll led Thomas Jefferson with 14 points, but he, like the rest of the team, had a tough shooting night. The Jaguars finished only 20 of 61 from the field and had few fast-break points despite forcing 26 Mustangs turnovers.

“When Joey can have a bad night like that … it's just more confidence for them,” DeCicco said. “It just shows them they can win when they're not playing their best.”

Several times it appeared the Jaguars were ready to blow the game open, but they made mistakes and allowed Laurel Highlands to stick around.

Thomas Jefferson opened the second half with a 16-7 run to take a 36-23 lead with 1:06 remaining in the third quarter, but the Mustangs fought back and cut the deficit to 42-38 with 1:56 to play.

Laurel Highlands had the ball with an opportunity to make it a one-possession game, but miscommunication led to a turnover. The Mustangs also turned the ball over on their next possession and Jaguars forward Chase Winovich sealed it with a pair of free throws with 5.2 seconds remaining to cap a 10-point, 13-rebound night.

Though Thomas Jefferson may have been unimpressed with Laurel Highlands on film, there is little doubt the team will be more ready for its quarterfinal opponent.

The sixth-seeded Jaguars will take on No. 3 Montour (19-4), a 43-25 winner over Ambridge, on Friday at a site and time to be determined. Montour defeated Thomas Jefferson, 69-47, on Jan. 23.

“We've got a big game Friday against Montour and, if we play like that, we'll get blown out of the gym,” DeCicco said. “It's as simple as that.”

Keith Barnes is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at kbarnes@tribweb.com or via Twitter @KBarnes_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.