ShareThis Page

Serra girls overcome slow start to rout Jefferson-Morgan

| Wednesday, Feb. 20, 2013, 11:09 p.m.
Serra Catholic's Danielle Dindak grabs a rebound WPIAL Single A playoff action at Peters Township High School on February 20, 2013  Ronald Vezzani Jr./Daily News
Serra Catholic's Danielle Dindak grabs a rebound WPIAL Single A playoff action at Peters Township High School on February 20, 2013 Ronald Vezzani Jr./Daily News

Jefferson-Morgan gave Serra Catholic all it wanted during Wednesday's Class A first-round playoff game ... for about five minutes.

No. 2 Serra worked through a sluggish start before going on for a convincing 85-45 win over Jefferson-Morgan at Peters Township. Serra trailed midway through the first quarter against a team it beat by 43 points two months ago.

“I was concerned, sure,” said veteran Serra coach Bill Cleary, who won his 521st career game. “Let's face it: we lost in the first round last year to Cornell, and I didn't want to go down the road again. To their credit, they were ready to play.”

Serra (21-2) advanced to Saturday's quarterfinal game against Rochester, a 47-36 winner over Monessen. The Eagles have lost their past five quarterfinal games and haven't advanced past that round since their WPIAL runner-up year of 2006.

Cleary doesn't want to look ahead too much to a possible return trip to the title game but knows it is very much attainable this year.

“We are playing Rochester on Saturday, and that is our focus right now,” Cleary said. “We are one step closer. Sure I want to get back to Palumbo, but we are going to take it one game at a time.”

Nine different players scored for Serra led by Megan Sieg's 18, Katie Sieg's 15 and Lindsay Muschar's 11 and 10 rebounds.

Kayla Yorko paced Jefferson-Morgan (10-14) with 16, and Jessica Taylor had 11.

“They have a good team, and they are tough when they can run all those numbers at you,” Jefferson-Morgan coach Ellen Hildebrand said. “They have the numbers in order to wear us down. But you can't take anything away from my kids.”

Especially early in the game.

Jefferson-Morgan took a 7-4 lead with three minutes left in the first quarter even though the Rockets were turning the ball over at an alarming rate. J-M had nearly twice as many turnovers (11) in the first quarter as it did field goal attempts (7). Jefferson-Morgan turned it over 34 times in the game.

“We really didn't come out with a lot of full-court pressure after the first quarter,” Cleary said. “We trapped them in the half court, and that made them rush their shots. We did miss a couple layups that got us off to a rocky start, but we knew that we would eventually make some shots because we were getting good looks early but just not making them.”

Serra outscored Jefferson-Morgan, 29-7, over the final 11:06 of the first half to take a 34-14 lead into the locker room. The Eagles did most of their damage at the foul line during the run, scoring 17 points that also compounded problems for Jefferson-Morgan.

Four Rockets had four fouls in the first half, and the team dressed only eight players.

“When we get into foul trouble and start to reach down our bench and have to move people around is when we get into trouble,” Hildebrand said.

Megan Sieg put the game away early in the second half by scoring Serra's first seven points to extend the lead to 39-18. Serra led, 60-30, by the end of the third.

Still, Cleary knows that if his team is to get back to the title game for the first time in seven years, it can't afford another slow start — especially against more accomplished teams.

“That's exactly what I told them that at the quarter break. I told them that at halftime, and we reminded them that at the end of the game,” Cleary said. “We can't start like this anymore or we will be going home.”

Mark Kaboly is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @MarkKaboly_Trib

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.