North Allegheny blitzes Fox Chapel with late run
TribLIVE Sports Videos
Fox Chapel was thinking upset for a little more than three quarters on Saturday afternoon.
But No. 2-seeded North Allegheny limited the Foxes to one field goal in the final 6:12 to come away with a 79-61 victory in a WPIAL Class AAAA boys basketball quarterfinal at North Hills High School.
The Foxes trailed, 15-14, at the end of the first quarter, led, 34-33, at the half and were behind, 52-51, at the end of three quarters. But after Matt D'Amico, who led Fox Chapel with 23 points and seven rebounds, hit a basket to give the Foxes a 55-54 lead with 6:12 remaining, the Tigers went on a 25-6 run to seal the victory.
North Allegheny (21-3) advances to the semifinals Wednesday against Section 3 rival Hampton at a site and time to be determined.
Top-ranked New Castle faces Section 3 foe Seneca Valley, meaning the four semifinalists in Class AAAA are all from the same section.
The only way the Foxes (17-7) can qualify for the PIAA tournament is if North Allegheny wins the WPIAL title.
R.J. Colabrese, who led the Tigers with 18 points, including 10 for 10 from the line, hit two free throws to give North Allegheny the lead for good with 6:00 left.
A Fox Chapel turnover resulted in a basket by Adam Haus, another Foxes turnover near midcourt led to a 3-pointer by Luke Soyster, and the Tigers were on their way.
“I thought in the second half, our pressure was much better,” North Allegheny coach Dave DeGregorio said. “We didn't get separation before because we didn't make our shots. But I like what we did; we turned them over and got our pace going. I thought that was big.”
Fox Chapel committed 13 turnovers in the second half; NA just one. James Meeker had seven rebounds for North Allegheny.
The Foxes' bench thought the 10-second call was premature, but coach Zach Skrinjar didn't think the game boiled down to one play.
“That's a momentum swing, but it was still a one-possession game,” Skrinjar said. “Probably the other five times we didn't do a good job of executing hurt us more than that.”
Another factor was bench scoring. North Allegheny's reserves scored 21 points, while David Brown (three points) was the only Fox Chapel backup to score.
“Toward the end, we really couldn't get into a flow and we were doing uncharacteristic things on our own,” Skrinjar said. “We were comfortable the whole game up until then. It was some self-inflicted wounds toward the end, probably a little fatigue. When you get tired, you're going to do some things — your body's doing one thing and your mind's doing another thing.”
George Guido is a freelance writer for Trib Total Media.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.