Share This Page

Canevin brings back Schoppe as head football coach

| Thursday, Feb. 21, 2013, 7:48 p.m.

As a senior at Canevin two decades ago, Darren Schoppe wrote that one of his goals was to someday become head football coach at his high school alma mater.

That day came Thursday.

Schoppe, an assistant at South Fayette, was hired to replace retiring coach Bob Jacoby, who led the Crusaders through 40 seasons and more than 200 victories. Schoppe, who turns 40 next month, was a senior linebacker in 1990 when Canevin won the WPIAL title.

“The program has given me a lot through the years and it's my time to give back,” he said.

After attending college at Frostburg State, Schoppe was an assistant to Jacoby for 13 seasons at Bishop Canevin, which was formerly known as Canevin Catholic. Owner of an in-ground pool installation company, Schoppe later worked one season as an assistant at Peters Township and the past six at South Fayette.

Yet, despite his senior-year prediction, leading the Crusaders was not high among his plans until recently.

“That (paper) was probably a smart remark more than anything else,” Schoppe said with a laugh. “I don't think it really was my dream ... but when the opportunity presented itself, I just thought it was the right fit at the right time.”

Jacoby, 67, retired last month as head coach, a position he had held since 1973. His record was 238-170-7.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.