ShareThis Page

Burrell ready for rematch with Quaker Valley

Bill Beckner Jr.
| Wednesday, Feb. 27, 2013, 12:06 a.m.
Matt Hess (left) and Burrell (18-6) will face Quaker Valley (20-4) in the WPIAL Class AA semifinals at 6 p.m. Wednesday, Feb. 27, 2013, at North Allegheny. (Erica Hilliard  |  Valley News Dispatch)
Matt Hess (left) and Burrell (18-6) will face Quaker Valley (20-4) in the WPIAL Class AA semifinals at 6 p.m. Wednesday, Feb. 27, 2013, at North Allegheny. (Erica Hilliard | Valley News Dispatch)

Burrell knows its semifinal opponent well, having played — and lost to — Quaker Valley earlier this season. But don't let that fool you. These aren't the same teams that met on the second night of the regular season.

Burrell, in particular, has come a long way since that game.

How far?

“Light years,” senior forward Cole Bush said. “Not even close to the same team we were then.”

And speaking of light years, Burrell has gone 34 years between semifinal appearances, the last coming in 1979.

But the resurgent Buccaneers (18-6) are back in the Final Four and will get another shot at the Quakers (20-4), seeded sixth in Class AA, when the teams play at 6 p.m. Wednesday at North Allegheny.

The winner advances to the championship game 1 p.m. Saturday at Duquesne's Palumbo Center.

“We say it after we break practice every day,” Burrell coach Rob Niederberger said. “Palumbo.”

Niederberger has said it from the start: Class AA is wide open. Before the playoffs, he thought at least eight teams had a shot at the title, including his Buccaneers, and Quaker Valley, which clipped No. 3 Seton-La Salle, 62-61, in the quarterfinals.

“It hasn't been this way in the past,” Niederberger said. “You had your Beaver Falls, Jeannettes, Aliquippas, way above everyone. Last year, Beaver Falls was unstoppable.”

Top-seeded Beaver Falls (21-3), which plays Cinderella candidate Apollo-Ridge (18-7) in the other semifinal, went 28-3 last season, beat Monessen in the WPIAL final and finished second in the state.

But with two Section 1 teams in the Final Four, one has to wonder if Niederberger was on to something.

“If we play our game, we'll be fine,” Niederberger said. “I think this team really started to come together after the Clairton loss (Jan. 19). I gave them Monday off to think about things. They came back focused and completely different. It changed right there.”

Burrell hasn't lost since, winning nine in a row.

Back to Burrell being a different team: The Bucs were without sixth man Joey Cox and key reserve James Liput, while senior forward Matt Hess and Bush were trying to regain form following football season, when they first played the Quakers.

Bush also hadn't played basketball seriously for two years. Thinking he'd regret not doing so in his senior year, he decided to come out for the team again.

Now, out of his cocoon and looking like one of the best big men in Class AA, Bush has helped the Bucs to wins over Beth-Center, Washington and No. 2 seed Greensburg Central Catholic in this dizzying playoff push.

“It hit me after we beat Washington,” Bush said. “We can play with anyone. We can do this.”

Niederberger said Burrell has become more methodical in its approach to schemes and has gotten production out of everyone in its rotation.

Bush and Hess fouled out three times this year, the most recent against Greensburg Central. But guards such as Alex White and Pete Spagnolo quickly chimed in with clutch 3-pointers.

When the teams played Dec. 8 on the second day of the Quaker Valley Tipoff Tournament, Burrell pulled out to a 15-point lead in the first half before the Quakers came roaring back to win, 53-39.

In that game, 6-foot junior guard Qadir Taylor had 16 points, 6-3 senior guard Burke Moser added 14, and 6-4 sophomore swingman Chris Conlan had 11 for Quaker Valley. Spagnolo had 15 and Hess 11 for Burrell.

Bill Beckner Jr. is the local sports editor of the Valley News Dispatch. Reach him at

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.