ShareThis Page

Burrell/Apollo-Ridge WPIAL final is a possibility

| Tuesday, Feb. 26, 2013, 12:16 a.m.
Erica Hilliard | Valley News Dispatch Burrell's Jake Prefling (left) defends the ball against Apollo Ridge's Alex Smith during the basketball game at Burrell High School on January 8, 2013.

Burrell versus Apollo-Ridge in the WPIAL Class AA boys basketball championship?

Could happen — really.

If both teams win semifinal games Wednesday night at North Allegheny, they'll meet Saturday afternoon on the WPIAL's grandest stage — Duquesne University's A.J. Palumbo Center — for the title.

A far-fetched notion when the season began, an all-local final could become reality if the teams continue to barnstorm the upset trail.

Alle-Kiski teams haven't met in a WPIAL basketball championship since Har-Brack played Ford City in 1938.

“Whoever gets hot is the team that makes a run,” Burrell coach Rob Niederberger said. “At this point, we have nothing to lose.”

Burrell (18-6) faces No. 6 seed Quaker Valley (20-4) at 6 p.m. Wednesday, with Apollo-Ridge (18-7) taking on No. 1 and defending champion Beaver Falls (21-3).

In a wild quarterfinal doubleheader that propelled both teams into the Final Four, Apollo-Ridge edged No. 4 Jeannette and Burrell clipped No. 2 seed Greensburg Central Catholic, with both games at Plum.

The WPIAL final in Class AA is set for 1 p.m. Saturday at Palumbo Center. The potential A-K final has the area buzzing with basketball interest.

“I think it's awesome for the section,” said Mark Ziemianski, a former Burrell boys coach who now serves as an assistant with the girls. “Section 1 always gets bad-mouthed. It's been that way for years. This shows these teams can play with some of the best.”

Seeing Burrell and Apollo-Ridge make playoff runs is bittersweet for other Section 1 coaches.

“It's made it a frustrating week,” said Deer Lakes Jon McKay, whose Lancers lost in the preliminary round to Shady Side Academy after sharing the Section 1 title with Burrell. “We beat both Burrell and Apollo-Ridge. On the other hand, it kind of validates what we did. You try to take some positives out of it.”

McKay also thinks the teams making it this far helps his section's stock.

“We were saying all along, this section is way better than people give it credit for,” McKay said. “Nobody wanted to hear that. Hopefully, the accomplishments of Burrell and Apollo-Ridge will give credence to that.”

One Apollo-Ridge senior guard wouldn't mind another shot at the school in which he shares a name.

Lukas Burrell assures he has no relatives on Burrell's team. The two pronunciations are slightly different.

“It's one of those funny things,” Burrell said. “I guess it's just happened that way.”

Burrell, the player, said his team is starting to believe it belongs among the WPIAL's top teams, even though the Vikings, like the Buccaneers, were not seeded in a packed Class AA bracket.

“At the beginning of the season, it never crossed my mind,” Burrell said. “We've had our ups and downs, but we knew at some point, we could come together.”

Burrell beat Apollo-Ridge twice this season, 55-33 and 57-41. In the first meeting, the Bucs' Cole Bush scored a career-high 33 points and grabbed 19 rebounds.

“I'm not shocked at all that they're in the semifinals,” McKay said. “We lost to both teams. Apollo-Ridge throttled us the first time we played. If you'd have asked me if they could get to the WPIAL finals, I'd have said, sure.”

Bill Beckner Jr. is the local sports editor of the Valley News Dispatch. Reach him at

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.