ShareThis Page

Hampton earns WPIAL title-game rematch with No. 1 New Castle

| Wednesday, Feb. 27, 2013, 10:36 p.m.
Hampton's Ryan Luther dunks on North Allegheny's James Meeker in the WPIAL Class AAAA semifinals at Chartiers Valley High School on Wednesday February 27, 2013. Sidney Davis | Tribune-Review
North Allegheny's Michael Carter rebounds over Hampton's Jon Floss in the WPIAL Class AAAA semifinals at Chartiers Valley High School on Wednesday February 27, 2013. Sidney Davis | Tribune-Review

Hampton can prepare for another evening at Palumbo Center.

The No. 3-seeded Talbots secured their fourth trip to the WPIAL basketball championships in five seasons — and their first in Class AAAA — with a 66-62 semifinal victory Wednesday night over No. 2 North Allegheny. Awaiting them in Saturday's title game will be New Castle, a rematch of last season's Class AAA championship.

Hampton won the WPIAL Class AAA title in 2009 and was runner-up in 2010 and 2012.

“We set our goals the same every year,” said junior Ryan Luther, who scored 27 points and sank all six of his fourth-quarter free-throw attempts. “Whether in Quad-A or (Triple-A), we're not going to try for anything less.”

Luther also had 10 rebounds and three blocks. The 6-foot-8 junior presents a mismatch for most any opponent and was dominant in the final quarter on both ends of the court. His six free throws were crucial, but so were his two blocks.

“Ryan Luther is our go-to guy, offensively and defensively,” Hampton coach Joe Lafko said. “He made some big plays tonight.”

North Allegheny led, 54-53, with 3:30 left after an 11-2 run that included a go-ahead basket by Sean Hennigan. The Tigers stole two consecutive inbounds passes from Hampton to claim the lead, but they couldn't hold it.

A quick 6-0 run gave Hampton a 59-54 lead with 2:18 left. Four of those six points were free throws by Luther.

Trailing 59-57 with 55 seconds left, North Allegheny forced another turnover, but an awkward-angle shot by James Meeker missed.

“Some of the experience is paying off with this group,” Lafko said. “Having the long playoff run last year was helpful to us. Everybody on the court played in those games last year. You just can't duplicate this kind of pressure and these kind of situations.”

David Huber had 12 points for Hampton, and Joey Lafko added 11. Meeker led North Allegheny with 19 points, Adam Haus had 15 points and Hennigan added 13.

North Allegheny held a 31-27 lead at half. But Hampton's perimeter defense closed out better on NA's shooters in the second half. The Talbots used their length in top-heavy zones and also switched less when playing man.

“When North Allegheny can spot up for wide-open threes, they're very effective shooting,” Lafko said.

North Allegheny made 7 of 17 from 3-point range in the first half, including four by Meeker and Joe Mancini. But the Tigers made just 3 of 16 in the second half against a Talbots defense more determined to contest them.

“Sometimes you go through a spell where your shots don't go,” North Allegheny coach Dave DeGregorio said. “You've just got to weather that storm, and they did. They knew they'd be there in the end. (We) had the momentum and everything with 2 minutes left, and then a couple plays happen and you're on the short end.”

Chris Harlan is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @CHarlanTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.