ShareThis Page

Clairton tries to put loss aside, focus on PIAA title

| Monday, March 4, 2013, 12:01 a.m.
Vicentian's Matt Rathz pulls down a rebound in front of Clairton's Bryon Clifford (3) and Santeaun Sims during the second half of their  WPIAL Class A boys championship game at A.J. Palumbo Center, Friday March, 3, 2013.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Vicentian's Matt Rathz pulls down a rebound in front of Clairton's Bryon Clifford (3) and Santeaun Sims during the second half of their WPIAL Class A boys championship game at A.J. Palumbo Center, Friday March, 3, 2013. Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review

There is a long hallway under the stands opposite the concourse at Duquesne University's Palumbo Center that houses, among other things, the locker rooms used for the WPIAL basketball playoffs.

After their gut-wrenching 86-74 loss to Vincentian in the WPIAL Class A basketball championship game Friday, heartbroken Clairton players looked longingly the length of that hallway at the Royals players smiling and celebrating their victory.

If nothing else, the Bears realized something. This was how they had made so many other teams feel during their state-record 63-game football winning streak that put four WPIAL and PIAA Class A trophies in the case. This was the disappointment those other schools had to deal with after shaking hands with the Bears and having silver medals draped around their necks like albatrosses after another in a series of systematic demolitions.

To put it bluntly, they didn't like it.

“It hurt us so bad because it's like a war that we lost,” Clairton senior Tyler Boyd said. “We never lose wars, and it's just something we can't take. We wanted to be out there throwing a rampage, but we had to hold everything in and we couldn't do anything about it, but it was painful.”

This group of players, most of whom play football and basketball, had never lost a championship game. They had been an unstoppable juggernaut as they hammered through the WPIAL and state football tournaments the last four years and had never lost a championship game.

Clairton had not lost in a title matchup since a 35-16 loss to Steelton-Highspire in the 2008 PIAA Class A finals — the year these current seniors were in eighth grade. Their only loss on the football field was a 15-8 loss at Laurel in their first game of their freshman year.

Usually when the pressure is on, this group is at its best. They even came up with an incredible upset in the semifinals when they knocked off top-seeded and defending WPIAL Class A champion Lincoln Park to get to the finals.

This time, however, it was not to be.

“I think this is going to be tough to get out of our system. I really do,” first-year coach Matt Geletko said. “But these are tough kids, and I think they're going to rebound well. It's going to be tough to put behind us. It really is.”

Unlike all the teams whose hopes Clairton (16-7) demolished in football, the Bears will have another breath of life Friday when they open PIAA Class A tournament play against District 10 runner-up Cochranton (15-9) at Plum High School.

It's also a second chance they don't want to squander.

“We're definitely going to go into practice hungrier,” Boyd said. “We get to start fresh. Now we have to look at trying to win the state championship after getting silver in the WPIAL, and we're just going to push each other.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.