Bethel Park pulls P-T girls into state tourney
Bethel Park's first WPIAL girls basketball championship was good news for Penn-Trafford.
With the Black Hawks' 48-34 win over Chartiers Valley in the final at the A.J. Palumbo Center on Saturday, the Warriors became the lucky quarterfinal losers to be pulled into the PIAA Class AAAA tournament by virtue of losing to the eventual champion.
Penn-Trafford (19-5) is seeded as the fifth-place team from the WPIAL, and it will face District 6 champ Hollidaysburg (22-2) in the first round at Altoona High School on Friday at 6 p.m.
“We practiced a couple times last week, in case it happened,” Penn-Trafford coach John Giannikas said.
“We knew Bethel Park had a good chance to win it all. Now, we're back to normal mode this week.”
In Hollidaysburg, the Warriors will face a team whose only two losses came against the WPIAL's two Class AA finalists, Bishop Canevin and Seton-La Salle. The team also boasts wins over Penn Hills and Seneca Valley on its schedule, so it is no stranger to P-T's local competition.
“They've got good size and a handful of shooters,” Giannikas said. “They're a real solid, aggressive team, and it will be a challenge, no doubt.”
While it will have been 14 days from P-T's last game to this one, Hollidaysburg also will be coming off a nine-day layoff after defeating Altoona for the District 6 crown, 71-53, on Feb. 27.
Matt Grubba is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-388-5830 or email@example.com.
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.