Basketball season ends with loss to Mt. Lebanon
Yet another successful season for Penn-Trafford girls basketball came to a close last week.
The Warriors were eliminated in the second round of the PIAA Class AAAA playoffs by perennial power Mt. Lebanon, 59-36, at Baldwin on March 12.
Taylor Cortazzo had 13 points to lead Penn-Trafford (20-6) in her final game, but it wasn't enough to overcome the Blue Devils (24-4).
A slow start crushed the Warriors' chances, as Mt. Lebanon pushed out to a 20-1 lead in the second quarter. A 3-pointer by Cortazzo was P-T's first field goal after more than nine minutes, and though the Warriors played evenly with the Blue Devils from that point, they were unable to rally.
“We gave up 13 points in the first quarter, which is decent,” Penn-Trafford coach John Giannikas said.
“We just couldn't score. They challenged every shot, and we tried to fight our way back, but we came up short.”
Even with the loss, this year's P-T team can look back on a 20-win season and wins in the WPIAL and PIAA playoffs as top achievements. And though the team didn't win a third straight section title as it hoped to, its coach had plenty of positives to reflect upon.
“You always wish you could have done more, but when you take a look back, they've had a great year,” Giannikas said. “They made it farther in the playoffs than they did last year, and these seniors only lost three section games in three years. Sure, we wish we were better at some things, but there's still a lot to be proud of.”
Matt Grubba is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-388-5830 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.