Share This Page

Fox Chapel's Huwar wins Cager Classic 3-point shooting contest

| Wednesday, March 27, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

The Cagers Classic was held this past weekend at Highlands High School and Fox Chapel Area High School's Nate Huwar brought home a trophy.

Huwar, a senior, won the 3-point contest at the Skills competition on Friday. He won the West contest with 13 points and kept up his torrid pace in the finals as he beat Kittanning's Sterling Henry, 12-8.

In the girls hot shot contest, FC's Rachel Ranii finished third for the East with 23 points while Alexa Yaksich had 18 points.

The East-West games were held on Saturday. Huwar scored two points as his West team fell to the East by a 93-83 score. In the girls game, Yaksich scored 12 points and Ranii had three as their East team picked up a 71-60 win.

Huwar will have one more all-star game to play in.

He was chosen to play in the Champions Association All-Star Game which will be played at Penn Hills High School at 5 p.m. on April 7. Fox Chapel coach Zach Skrinjar and his staff will coach the WPIAL team which will face the City League all-star team.

Marty Stewart is a sports editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-782-2123 or mstewart@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.