Kosanovich, Cleary share Coach of the Year honor
TribLIVE Sports Videos
The Serra Catholic and Elizabeth Forward girls basketball teams enjoyed similar seasons.
Both schools have junior-laden squads that were thought to be a year away from making a run to a title; both played eight deep from the bench; and they relied on a stifling defense and transition game to get fastbreak baskets.
Oh, and both finished with identical 24-4 records, ended up playing for a WPIAL title at Palumbo Center and won first-round games in the state playoffs.
It would have been difficult to pick one coach as the 2013 Daily News Girls Basketball Coach of the Year, so Serra Catholic's Bill Cleary and Elizabeth Forward's Sam Kosanovich will share the honor.
For Cleary, this year was something of a renaissance. He won his 500th career game at the end of the 2011-12 season. Serra Catholic had not played in the title game since losing to Monessen in 2006, which was also the last time the Eagles had won a state playoff game.
Instead of settling into what could have been a tune-up for a playoff run in 2014, Cleary did one of the best coaching jobs of his career. He got the most out of an inexperienced group and took them into the Class A title game, where they lost, 53-46, to a Vincentian team defending its title.
“I think it was just the players that really came together, and they really played well together,” Cleary said. “I saw that early on in the summer that it was a unique group that had talent but was very unselfish. They didn't worry about the scoring averages. They just wanted to play well.”
Kosanovich had the same kind of impact at Elizabeth Forward. Only two players averaged in double figures, as the Warriors bought into a team-first mentality.
“It was probably a mixed bag of what we were going against defensively and what we had to do offensively, and these players, when they had an opportunity, they took advantage of it and made the most of it,” Kosanovich said. “I can honestly say that it was a different one every game, and they knew coming in that it was going to be our philosophy.”
Three different players led the Warriors in scoring in their three WPIAL Class AAA playoff victories. Using that template, Elizabeth Forward ended quite a few droughts: It qualified for the WPIAL Class AAA championship game for the first time since 1977 and played for its first title since losing to Penn Hills in Class AAAA in 1990.
In addition, the Warriors also won their first state playoff game when they defeated Central Valley in the opening round of the PIAA Class AAA tournament at Baldwin.
“They deserve all the credit because the players are the ones that have to go out there and keep the streaks going and make a statement to the other team,” Kosanovich said. “As far as my accomplishment in that, I just hope that I had a positive influence on them, both on and off the court, but 100 percent of the credit goes to the players because they have to go out and play the game.”
Both coaches also have the same problem: expectations. Now that both have played in a championship game with young teams, they will be frontrunners to get there again — and win it — next season.
“Being down there, it was special day, and we hope to build on that,” Cleary said. “It was great getting to the state tournament and seeing what the level of talent is. Now, we know where we have to go and what we have to do to get there.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.