The Hempfield Area School Board voted, 6-2, Monday night to open the boys basketball coach position, held by Jim Nesser.
“I'm a little surprised,” Nesser said. “We won three section titles and won 22 consecutive home games. They didn't give me a reason why. I guess it's not about winning.”
Board member Randy Stoner, who voted to hire Nesser in 2009, was the only board member to abstain. When Stoner originally refused to say why he didn't vote, board member Jeanne Smith said he must explain his decision under voting rules. He then said, “I don't feel comfortable with my decision.”
The vote came after a spirited executive session, with board member Diane Ciabattoni phoning in a vote.
“We don't feel we're getting rid of Mr. Nesser,” Hempfield School Board President Sonya Brajdic said. “He can reapply if he wants to.”
Brajdic refused to answer if the board received complaints from parents.
Nesser is unsure if he will reapply. He said he's weighing his options.
Nesser coached four seasons at Hempfield, where his teams compiled a 58-32 record, including a 36-10 mark the past two seasons. Hempfield won or shared three section titles, but it did not win a game in the playoffs.
Nesser was hired to replace Bill Swan, who coached eight seasons at Hempfield.
Rich Gazarik contributed. Paul Schofield is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org or via Twitter @Schofield_Trib.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.