Springdale OKs Vlassich as new girls basketball coach
TribLIVE Sports Videos
His resume lists several coaching positions at Class AAAA and AAA basketball programs, but George Vlassich has a soft spot for small-town teams.
That's how he ended up at Springdale.
The Allegheny Valley School District's board approved Vlassich, 66, as the varsity girls basketball coach during its meeting Monday night. Selected from among seven applicants, Vlassich won the position with a background that includes coaching experience at Hampton, Vincentian and North Hills.
“It's a totally different animal, Class AA and Class AAAA,” said Vlassich, who coached the 2003 Vincentian girls team that reached the WPIAL Class AA semifinals. “(Class) AA was a good fit for me. I love the smallness of everything.”
Vlassich replaces Dan Ross, who coached Springdale from 2011-13 and also led the program from 2006-08.
Much of Vlassich's coaching time was accrued at North Hills. He started his career in the early '90s at Hampton where he assisted the girls team for one season.
He spent two seasons as an assistant for the North Hills girls team. He moved to North Hills' boys coaching staff and spent five years as an assistant.
After one season at Vincentian, Vlassich was hired at North Hills and remained there for five seasons.
A retired math teacher who worked at Pittsburgh Public Schools, Vlassich considers himself in the twilight of his coaching days. He promises to dedicate his final few years to cultivating more of a basketball culture at a district he knows has a strong soccer presence.
“That's probably my toughest competition,” he said of soccer. “It's going to be tough to sell them on basketball. … You've got to find kids who want to buy into the program.”
Bill West is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at email@example.com or via Twitter @BWest_Trib.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.