Cheswick Christian girls relying on defense, experience this season
Cheswick Christian Academy's girls basketball team will try to do things the oldfashioned way this year, relying on defense and experience to turn around a 9-11 record in the Southwest Christian Athletic Conference.
The Chargers return three key starters from last year: junior guards Jacque Willis and Alyssa Slancauskas and senior guard Ariel Festa.
“They have the most experience and they started last year,” coach Deric Johnson said. “They are three kids we are relying upon more than anybody.”
Johnson said Festa is the team's best defensive player and has improved her ball-handling and shooting.
Willis missed time last year with injuries, but Johnson expects her to contribute. Both Festa and Willis have the potential to lead the team in scoring.
“Jackie and Alyssa have led the team in scoring in the past,” Johnson said. “I have every expectation we will get better in the front court as the year goes on.”
The final two starting spots will be between three forwards: sophomore Nicole Pugliese, senior Sarah Evans and freshman Kathleen Swartzwelder.
“Some of the girls have just improved,” Johnson said. “We will see natural improvement in terms of another year of experience. We will struggle early on and adjust to the lack of scoring, but I think we will pick that up quickly when we learn who we can go to. It's a new team, so we have to develop new leadership and scoring.”
D.J. Vasil is a freelance writer.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.