Anytime a team can return four starters and its sixth man from the previous season's playoff team there is reason for optimism. That is the table set for the Shaler Titans basketball team this season, as a talented starting five returns to build off of last season's success.
Seniors Paige Quinn, Abby Conrad, Carly Harris and junior Andi Lydon all started last season, and Liz Klein was the first player off the bench to spark the attack.
“Andi is getting some small D-I and D-2 looks, and Carly has signed her letter of intent for UMBC,” said Neal Martin, Shaler head coach.
“Paige and Anny are getting some looks too.”
Martin expects Kline will step in and fill the spot of Courtney Bauer and help the team build on last year's success.
“How we play will not change … we will bring pressure and push the ball and we have more kids who are ready for more situations,” Martin said. “This season won't be a major overhaul. I hope to do a lot of what we did, only better.”
“Our senior captains lead in various ways and we have a nice freshman class who is learning the way,” Martin said.
The playoffs last year served as a teaching tool and was an experience Martin said there is no substitute for.
“There are big section games, but there is nothing like the playoffs,” Martin said.
The team is sharing the ball according to Martin and there is nobody demanding shots, making everyone an equal part of the offense.
“That is a big asset and I hope they pass that trait along,” Martin said.
Jerry Clark is a sports editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-779-6979 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.