ShareThis Page

West Shamokin's success depends on blend of old, new players

| Tuesday, Dec. 3, 2013, 10:18 p.m.
West Shamokin's Zane Clowser (left) battles Jesse Sequeira for a loose ball during a 36-35 win at Ford City on Friday, Jan. 18, 2013.
West Shamokin's Zane Clowser (left) battles Jesse Sequeira for a loose ball during a 36-35 win at Ford City on Friday, Jan. 18, 2013.
Penn State's Tim Frazier dunks over Pitt's Talib Zanna in the second half Tuesday, Dec. 3, 2013, at Petersen Events Center.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Penn State's Tim Frazier dunks over Pitt's Talib Zanna in the second half Tuesday, Dec. 3, 2013, at Petersen Events Center.

A large senior class walked out the door last year for the West Shamokin boys basketball team, but the Wolves have plenty of young players prepared to step into those positions.

The Wolves will rely on veteran guard play and some first-time varsity regulars as they aim to claim one of the playoff spots from Section 1-AA for a third straight year.

Among graduation losses for West Shamokin are 1,000-point scorer Anthony Rocco and a group of experienced post players, but Wolves coach Mike Nagy is optimistic about the players who will be entering his rotation.

“Anthony Rocco is obviously going to be sorely missed, and inside we had some solid players, but we have a nice group of underclassmen, and our JVs did really well last year,” Nagy said.

Senior point guard Zane Clowser is the team's top returning scorer at more than 9 points per game last year, and junior guard Zac Horner gives the Wolves two starters returning in the backcourt.

The team's third guard spot has a trio of players vying for the starting role.

Two of those players, Alex Lasslo and Adam Crise, are juniors, while senior Andrew Brocious is trying to make a return to the court after recovering from an ACL injury.

“Traditionally, we're small, but this year is actually the most height we've had in a long time,” Nagy said.

“But we've always been guard-oriented, and we've always liked to pressure people and get out running. Hopefully (guard play) will be a strength of ours again this year.”

On the interior, the Wolves will be looking for juniors Ryan Dean, Jake Hough and Scott Przybysz to take lead roles, and Nagy said that all three will receive solid minutes.

The team also has a trio of sophomores that could be in the mix for playing time. Guards Brandon Stover and Jarret Kintz provide added depth at the three outside positions, while forward Ryan Bradigan-Barnett (6-foot-6) is the team's tallest player and will be used for his size advantage over other post players.

“We're pretty deep this year, and a lot of these kids are going to get playing time. That competition for playing time and starting spots will make us better as the year goes on,” Nagy said.

The Wolves aren't the only team in the section dealing with heavy graduation losses.

Last year's section co-champs, Burrell and Deer Lakes, also will have a lot of fresh faces in the lineup.

Because of player turnover, Apollo-Ridge's run to the WPIAL semifinals and expected improvement from Ford City and Summit Academy, Section 1-AA could be a wide-open race for both the section title and all four playoff spots.

“Our goals are more fundamental goals. We want to work hard every night and let the other things take care of themselves,” Nagy said.

“It's our 14th year at West Shamokin and we have yet to win a section title, so I know that's something the kids would like to do this year. But that's on the back burner, because we have to worry about today before we can look down the road at those kinds of things.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.