Share This Page

Charleroi rolls past Monessen

| Saturday, Dec. 7, 2013, 12:01 a.m.
Jim Ference | The Valley Independent
Monessen's Sha'Nia Windom (13) fights for the ball with Charleroi's Mia Woytovich (11) during the Charleroi Lady Cougars Tip Off Classic at Charleroi High School on Friday, December 6,2013.

When a veteran team goes against an inexperienced team, an ugly game is usually a good possibility.

And while Charleroi's 59-26 win over Monessen in the second contest of the Charleroi Tip-Off Tournament was an ugly game, it was ugly on both sides — particularly in the first half.

While the inexperienced Lady Greyhounds failed to make a basket in the first quarter and were hurt by numerous turnovers in falling behind, 16-4, the Lady Cougars were having their own issues shooting the ball.

Monessen was 0-8 from the field and 4-for-12 from the free throw line in the opening quarter.

Charleroi, however, hit just 7 of 20 shots to shoot 35 percent.

And while the Lady Cougars widened their lead to 27-11 at halftime, they shot even worse in the second quarter, making just 4 of 17 shots.

“We only shot 30 percent in the first half and it was ugly, not very good, but I think that was just a case of butterflies in the stomach from the first game of the season,” said Charleroi coach Joe Grodz. “I mean, we had the shots and did what we were supposed to do. They just didn't go in.

“And when you are taking that many shots, it shows that you have had plenty of opportunities.”

Charleroi upped its lead to 30-11, making the first two baskets of the third quarter before Monessen went on a 7-0 run with six of the points coming off three baskets by Mariha Johnson.

After Monessen cut the deficit to 30-18 with 4:52 left in the third quarter, Grodz called time out to settle his team.

The Lady Cougars went on to score the next 11 points to get the lead back up to 41-18.

In the fourth quarter, the Lady Cougars went on a 14-2 spree to open a 55-22 lead, and Grodz pulled his starters for the night.

Monessen coach Gina Naccarato said her team did about what she expected because of its inexperience.

“We are so inexperienced and even the players we have who played some last year really didn't get much real game experience,” Naccarato said. “For us, it's back to the basics. But I think we will get better because I saw some good things in spurts.

“If we could have made some shots, we could have been more competitive in the first half.”

The Lady Greyhounds made just 2 of 21 shots in the opening two quarters.

Charleroi was led by Mia Woytovich with 17 points, including 10 in the first half.

Teammate Anjie Tilghman scored 15, with nine coming in the second half.

Also for Charleroi, Lynsey Wright scored 12 points.

“That's exactly what I expect out of my first six players, that at least three of them — any of them — scores in double figures every night,” said Grodz. “That's what we are going to need.”

Monessen was led by Johnson with 11 points, eight in the second half.

Teraee Bradford and Sidney Fincik added six points each.

The two teams resume play today in the round-robin tournament, with Monessen playing Carmichaels at 4 p.m. and Charleroi taking on Clairton at 6 p.m.

Carmichaels defeated Clairton, 49-19, in the first game Friday.

Tonight's action will be a tripleheader as Charleroi and Ringgold will meet in a boys' game at 8 p.m.

The Rams and Cougars were scheduled to play Friday, but the game was postponed because of the weather.

Jeff Oliver is a sports editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-684-2666 or joliver@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.