First-year coach looking for returning players to pace Shady Side Academy boys
The Shady Side Academy boys basketball team, under first-year coach David Vadnais, hopes to improve on last year's 9-15 record, which included a 6-6 mark in the section.
“We have some established players returning, and we hope that they can lead the way for our new players,” Vadnais said.
The Indians will return three starters in 5-foot-9 guard Dan Marous, 6-2 guard Kyle Olander, both seniors; and 6-4 sophomore forward Mike Ware, who opened some eyes as a freshman last year.
Junior Patrick Loughran, a 6-1 guard/forward, also made a few starts.
Returning letterwinners are 6-0 senior guard/forward Chuck Calabrese, 6-2 senior guard forward T-Jay Cleveland, 6-2 senior forward Cam Dively, 6-0 senior guard Josh Levy, 5-10 junior guard Tyler Demchak, 6-0 junior guard Jackson Fitzgerald and 5-10 junior guard Sean Gramley.
Senior Matt O'Connor, a 6-3 center, returns to the team after taking a year off, and he will be joined by newcomers Nick Andreos (5-9, junior guard), Alec Bernstein (5-11, junior guard), Dylan Groff (6-2, junior guard/forward) and Phil King (6-2, junior forward).
Vadnais said the strength of the team will be its depth and getting Olander back.
“He was off to a great start last year before being lost for the season with an ankle injury,” Vadnais said. “I think he could surprise some people, even though he is a senior.”
The coach said he has a lot of players who could bring talent off the bench.
“If we can improve their all-around game, our bench could become a real strength,” he said.
A deep bench will help the Indians as they prepare for a tough section battle.
“GCC and Jeannette should be the teams to beat in our section,” Vadnais said.
Marty Stewart is a sports editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-782-2123 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.