Share This Page

Butler girls looking for another trip to postseason

| Saturday, Dec. 14, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

Butler's girls basketball team snapped a two-year playoff drought last season.

The Golden Tornado want to make sure they keep up that postseason trend.

However, Butler has a new-look team this year after graduating three starters. And, with only one senior, head coach Dorothea Epps has a young squad.

“Each game, we're trying to build on where we're at. Just learning the game is big for them, I think, and learning how to finish games,” she said. “I see a lot of positive things. I like their energy. I like that they will try to do whatever we ask them to do. I think that'll prove to be successful for this team.”

The Tornado got their first in-game lesson at the Penn Hills Tipoff Tournament. Butler dropped a 55-49 decision to the hosts in overtime to open the event.

“The first game I thought was a tell-tale sign of where we are and what we need to work on. I thought they played well in that first game — just a couple balls or foul shots here and there (were the difference),” Epps said. “All in all, I was pleased with the effort. It was a lot of the girls' first time starting or seeing any varsity time. It's a big-time jump from junior varsity and a big adjustment.”

The Tornado rebounded for a 52-12 win over Kiski in the consolation game.

“We were playing a Kiski team that lost several players, so it's hard to judge where we are really at,” Epps said. “By no means is it any knock on Kiski. They were just missing a lot of kids and had some injuries.”

Overall, it was an encouraging start for Butler.

“Our whole goal was to try to go and execute our game and work on things we know we need to work on. We still have some bugs to work out,” Epps said. “The weekend helped out the girls with confidence, especially the girls who haven't played a lot. It helped that we played a really good Penn Hills team.

“It's a growing process for these girls. They did a nice job. We're trying to figure out our identity with all these players.”

Julia Baxter, a returning starter, scored 19 points against Penn Hills and added 17 points against Kiski.

“She is really our first or second (scoring) option,” Epps said. “She has done a great job. She is a hustler. She is all over the court.”

Kalynn Callihan is a returning starter as well. However, she has been limited with a broken thumb.

“It's hard for her to execute, but she did a good job,” Epps said. “She hit some 3-pointers and has to help handle ball.”

Alyssa DiPippa, a junior, takes over point guard duties this year.

“She is now having to quarterback this team. She has done a nice job,” Epps said. “She is really growing into that position. She's doing very well, as far as leading them.”

Lauren Bresnahan, the team's lone senior, is a starter. Ronni Guiney, Danielle Hensel and Tiana Schaffner are competing for the fifth starting spot.

“We lost so much on the defensive end and scoring end, so we're just trying to find that combination and our identity as a team,” Epps said. “We have a lot of underclassmen that just aren't ready for this level of play. Overall, I am pleased with what they did at the tournament. We just know we have a lot of work to do.”

Epps is encouraged with her team's progress.

“I think their hustle is a strength. They play hard and they understand they have to stay in games (and not get in foul trouble). They are always going to go out and give 100 percent. Really, our weakness would be the experience of being on the floor in crucial times,” she said. “They are great girls. It's just a matter of working on execution and getting the confidence they need out there.

“I can see they are growing from what we did in the fall until now.”

Joe Sager is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.