ShareThis Page

Perz scores game-high 33 to lift Norwin past Monessen

| Tuesday, Dec. 10, 2013, 10:48 p.m.
Steph Chambers | Tribune-Review
Norwin's Logan Deri (center) battles Monessen's Tyler Yuille for a loose ball on Tuesday, Dec. 10, 2013, at Franklin Regional High School.
Steph Chambers | Tribune-Review
Norwin's Alexander Hass rebounds the ball against Monessen's Kayne Jackson on Tuesday, Dec. 10, 2013, at Franklin Regional High School.
Steph Chambers | Tribune-Review
Franklin Regional's Jake Roberge goes up for a shot as he is fouled by Westinghouse's Khalil Morris (bottom right) on Tuesday, Dec. 10, 2013, at Franklin Regional High School.
Steph Chambers | Tribune-Review
Monessen's Javon Brown goes up for a layup against Norwin's Logan Deri, left and Curtis Perz, right on Tuesday, Dec. 10, 2013, at Franklin Regional High School.
File photo
Monessen coach Joe Salvino, shown complaining to the referee about a call against his team during a game against Norwin earlier this season, was much more calm and pleased Tuesday night.
Steph Chambers | Tribune-Review
Monessen's Lavalle Rush catches a rebound against Norwin's Zach Bryan on Tuesday, Dec. 10, 2013, at Franklin Regional High School.
Steph Chambers | Tribune-Review
Monessen's Javon Brown reacts after he committed a foul on Tuesday, Dec. 10, 2013, at Franklin Regional High School.

Two different opinions came out of Tuesday's nonsection game between Norwin and Monessen at the annual Mike Rettger Memorial Basketball Tournament at Franklin Regional.

Norwin outscored Monessen, 10-3, over the final four minutes to pull out a 68-63 victory in a game that featured mixed reviews from the coaches.

Norwin coach Lynn Washowich, while happy with the win, was not pleased with the way his team play defensively in the first half and offensively in the second half.

“The object is to win, and I was pleased with our composure down the stretch,” he said. “We were upset with their lack of willingness to play defense in the first half. They weren't doing the little things they were taught.”

Monessen coach Joe Salvino, however, saw some positives from his team's effort.

“I was proud that we never quit,” he said. “We had a chance to win but we let it go. We made a couple mistakes and missed a couple shots down the stretch.

“It was a better effort, in fact, the best effort of the season.”

Norwin (2-1) will play Franklin Regional at 7:30 p.m. Wednesday in the championship game, while Monessen (0-3) will meet Westinghouse at 6 p.m.

Norwin raced out to a 20-11 lead after one quarter and led 37-29 at halftime.

Norwin opened up a 44-31 lead early in the third quarter, but Monessen began to control the tempo and went on a 10-0 run to get back in the game.

Monessen and led 53-52 after three quarters thanks to the play of Lavalle Rush (16 points) and Javon Brown (16). They combined for 16 points in the third quarter.

“We got up 13 and then didn't get off a shot for six consecutive possessions,” Washowich said.

“We were out of control offensively. We need to slow things down.”

The fourth quarter turned into a battle between Norwin's Curtis Perz and Monessen's Clintell Gillaspie.

Perz, who finished with a game-high 33 points, scored 10 points in the final quarter. Perz scored the Knights' first eight points of the final quarter.

Gillaspie, who ended up with a team-high 22 points, had seven points in the quarter.

But it was a defensive change by Norwin, switching from a man-to-man to a 3-2 zone, that slowed down Monessen's offense.

“We just didn't make a couple outside shots,” Salvino said. “They took away our penetration.”

Paul Schofield is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @Schofield_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.