Share This Page

Daily News roundup: Top-seeded Elizabeth Forward rolls past Frazier

| Wednesday, Dec. 11, 2013, 10:48 p.m.

George Prota had another strong performance, scoring a game-high 21 points as Class AAA No. 1 Elizabeth Forward (5-0) defeated Frazier, 70-50, in nonsection action Wednesday.

Charlie Manack recorded a double-double with 16 points and 10 rebounds for Frazier (1-2).

South Allegheny 46, East Allegheny 33 — Ty Cook and Jeiron Lewis each scored 15 points as South Allegheny (2-2) won a nonsection contest.

Thomas Jefferson 81, KeystoneOaks 39 — Jason Horan led all scorers with 18 points as Class AAA No. 6 Thomas Jefferson (3-1) earned a nonsection victory. Taylor Lehman led Keystone Oaks (0-3) with 14 points.

Girls basketball

Obama Academy 64, Woodland Hills 32 — Michaela Porter and Kayla Payne each had 12 points to lead Obama Academy (2-2) to a nonsection win. Sarah Miller scored 14 for Woodland Hills (1-3).

Thomas Jefferson 63, Clairton 24 — Alexis Yanief led all scorers with 19 points as Thomas Jefferson (2-2) won in nonsection action. Deshawna Stewart scored 11 points for Clairton (0-3).

Wrestling

South Allegheny 46, Carrick 21 — Alyssa Kennedy (113 pounds), Liam Czerniak (120), Alex Pergantis (145), Cody Jenkins (152), Steven Shriane (160) and Seth Hitchens (285) earned pins to lead South Allegheny to a nonsection win.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.