Eden Christian girls basketball teams look to overcome lack of depth
A lack of depth is expected to hinder the Eden Christian girls basketball team (0-2) this year.
The Warriors do not have as many players as in previous seasons.
“We're going to have to avoid injuries and stay out of foul trouble,” coach Steve Good said.
Eden Christian played a Section 2-A game against Imani earlier this week.
Results were not available before this edition's deadline.
Eden Christian lost to Ambridge and South Fayette, both of Class AAA, in nonsection games.
The Warriors play at Cornell in a nonsection game Friday.
Their next section game will be against North Catholic in two weeks.
Eden Christian suffered a big loss when Aila Bradford graduated. Bradford averaged 15 points in leading the Warriors to their first WPIAL playoff appearance last season.
Junior point guard Abbie Bazzoli (12 points per game) is the Warriors' top scorer so far this season.
Sophomore center Nicole Hauskins is averaging about eight in her first year as a starter.
Bazzoli leads a strong backcourt that includes junior Jenna Santoro and senior Lydia Manges.
Santoro averaged about eight points last year.
Manges is a superb passer, Good said.
In her first year as a starter, junior forward Sarah Aiken said the three guards have been helpful.
“They've really encouraged me,” Aiken said.
“I want everybody to play well,” said Manges, noting the importance of returning to the playoffs in her final season.
Sophomore forward Leah Bovard and senior guard Paige Clary also will play.
Eden Christian lost to Jefferson Morgan, 29-25, early in the WPIAL tournament a year ago.
Karen Kadilak is a freelance writer.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.