Freeport girls basketball team downs Valley
TribLIVE Sports Videos
The Valley girls basketball team has yet to win, but first-year coach Mindy Beale White sees progress.
On Monday night, Valley (0-3, 0-2) stayed with Freeport (4-1, 2-0) for nearly a half, but periodic lapses enabled the Yellowjackets to pull away for an 82-59 Section 1-AAA home victory.
The lead changed hands eight times in the first half before Freeport staged a 14-0 run to take control.
Sophomore Zoe Soilis poured in 20 points and had six steals for Freeport, and teammate Macy Smolic added 18 points, including 10 of 12 from the free-throw line.
The effort offset an outstanding performance by Valley's Lashay Madison, who had 25 points and 22 rebounds.
Kaylyn Iacopino had 22 for the Vikings.
“It's had its battles here and there, but it's been good,” White said of the start to her coaching career. “We've been playing three quarters of ball, not four. Freeport had 18 points in foul shots. That's just mental errors on our part.”
White wasn't hired until September, putting the team behind squads that were together over the summer.
Meanwhile, Freeport coach Paul Sylba knew what was in store for his team.
“Valley has some talented players,” Sylba said. “We were worried about them. I thought we got some composure late in the first half. Even in our victory, Valley still put up 59 points.”
Soilis started out strong, scoring 11 points in the first period. Iacopino and Madison countered with nine apiece.
A basket by Jame' Reese with 2:43 to go in the half gave the Vikings their final lead of the game.
Iacopino picked up her third foul with 27 seconds left in the half, further hampering Valley's chances.
Michaela Bowser and Haley Connor helped propel the Yellowjackets in the third period with eight and six points, respectively.
George Guido is a freelance writer.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.