Charlie Scharbo scored a game-high 24 points as Thomas Jefferson (6-1) earned a 62-36 victory over Fleetwood in the KSA Tournament in Orlando, Fla., on Friday.
The Jaguars play St. Stephens's Episcopal (Texas) on Saturday.
West Mifflin 36, St . Francis (Ont ario) 32 — West Mifflin (5-1) fought its way to a victory in the KSA Tournament in Orlanda, Fla., without any players scoring in double-digits. The Titans will play in the tournament championship Saturday.
Latrobe 44, Norwin 39 — Matt Cullen's 12 points led Latrobe (2-4, 1-1) in a Section 1-AAAA win. Curtis Perz scored 11 for Norwin (2-5, 0-3), which led 20-12 at halftime.
Central Catholic 61, McKeesport 57 — Sean Whalen led all scorers with 16 points as Central Catholic (5-1, 3-0) earned a victory in Section 2-AAAA. William Gadson scored 16 points for McKeesport (2-4, 0-3).
Yough 55, S outhmoreland 3 0 — The Cougars used a 33-9 halftime advantage to lock up a Section 3-AAA victory. Josh Sterner scored 15 for Yough (2-6, 1-2), and Ben Niemiec's 13 points led Southmoreland (1-5, 0-3).
East Allegheny 36, Clairton 35 – Cache Street led all scorers with 16 points as East Allegheny (1-5) narrowly defeated Clairton (0-6) in nonsection action. Malaysha Pettiford led the Bears with 12 points.
Serra Catholic 84, Ca rrick 4 1 — Serra Catholic (5-1) used a 41-point first quarter to cruise to a nonsection victory. Leslie Hoye led all scorers with 21 points for the Eagles. Chardonnay Little-John scored 17 points for Carrick (2-3).
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.