Free-throw disparity spells trouble for Clairton boys basketball team
TribLIVE Sports Videos
The Clairton boys basketball team's matchup against Shaler on Friday afternoon at Gateway was decided at the free-throw line.
The Titans made 24 foul shots, while the Bears attempted only seven.
That disparity — Shaler went 24 for 36, and Clairton was just 2 for 7 — was the driving force behind the Titans' 57-37 win on Day 2 of the Gateway Hoops Classic.
“We work on it,” Shaler coach Brian Bibek said. “So I expect guys to be able to step to the line and make foul shots at the end of the game.
“It's something that's been emphasized, so it's good to see that it's carried over from practice to the game.”
Trailing the entire second half and by 10 entering the fourth quarter, Clairton was forced to put more pressure on the ball defensively and send Shaler (2-7) to the line in an attempt to extend the game.
“We were kind of forced into taking some risks,” Clairton coach Matt Geletko said. “Then once the lead got extended a little bit, we had to take even more risks and foul and put them on the line.”
Coming off a 54-31 loss to Gateway on the opening day of the tournament Thursday, the Titans got 20 points from senior guard Zach Weaver. Senior Kevin Mincher added 16.
“They're seniors,” Bibek said. “They did what I asked them to do. They were both good.”
Geletko was encouraged by his team's defensive performance, but Clairton could not match Shaler's scoring.
“That's been the story all year: We haven't executed offensively as well as we should be,” he said.
“That's going to get us in trouble.”
In just their third game of the season, the Bears were paced by senior Isaiah Hollis' 10 points. Junior guard Ryan Williams added eight.
Some of Clairton's struggles offensively can be attributed to its late start to the season as virtually all of its opponents have several games in hand.
But Geletko said that while games in December are nice to win, he's most concerned with getting his team prepared for when it begins Section 3-A play starting Jan. 3 against Mapletown.
“At this point, most teams have played seven, eight games plus two scrimmages,” he said. “So you use those scrimmages to work through stuff like that, and even these early season games, you're still working through stuff to make sure you're ready for section play. That's the ultimate goal here when section play starts next week. That's what we want to be ready for.”
After losing its first two games at the Gateway Hoops Classic, Clairton (1-2) will look to win its tournament finale Saturday when it takes on Woodland Hills (0-8) at 2 p.m. in the seventh-place game.
Alex Oltmanns is a freelance writer.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.