ShareThis Page

Quaker Valley girls earn split at Riverside Tournament

| Tuesday, Dec. 31, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Quaker Valley's Moriah Wigley participates in a drill during basketball practice on Thursday, Nov. 21, 2013, at the school.
Kristina Serafini | Sewickley Herald
Quaker Valley's Moriah Wigley participates in a drill during basketball practice on Thursday, Nov. 21, 2013, at the school.

They're getting better.

That applies to the play of the Quaker Valley girls basketball team on the court as well as the general health of the team, according to first-year head coach Jill Brumbaugh.

The Quakers (3-5) split a pair of games in a holiday tournament at Riverside High School last weekend despite several key players missing practice and game action with the flu.

“We've been calling it the Quaker Valley bug,” said Brumbaugh, who was battling illness herself over the weekend. “We need to get rid of it.”

After dropping a 69-42 decision to Hollidaysburg last Friday in the first game of the Riverside tournament, Quaker Valley bounced back to register a 44-34 win over the host Panthers on Saturday.

“Hollidaysburg is a very good team,” Brumbaugh said. “We got down early, but we were able to come back by getting the ball inside.

“That was promising.”

Freshman Alana Davidson paced Quaker Valley with 17 points against Hollidaysburg.

Against Riverside, improved defensive play was the catalyst for the Quakers' 10-point victory.

“Riverside was a nice win for us,” Brumbaugh said. “We really picked up the defense.”

As the season progresses, Brumbaugh would like to see her team increase its scoring output while continuing to lock down the opposition on the defensive end of the floor.

“We need to get our scoring up a little bit,” Brumbaugh said. “If we can get our scoring into the 50s and keep teams in the 30s, we'll start winning more games.”

Quaker Valley was able to do just that in its lone section victory of the season so far, a 57-38 win at Montour on Dec. 12. The Quakers entered this week with a 1-2 record in Section 5-AAA, which was good for fifth place.

Back-to-back losses to Trinity and South Park followed the Montour win, but Quaker Valley was far from full strength in those games thanks to the flu that began making its rounds through the team.

“It's hard to develop consistency when you can't practice together,” Brumbaugh said. “We've played well together when everyone's been healthy.”

The “backbone” of the team, according to Brumbaugh, has been the consistent play of junior guards Karen Pugh and Kayla Foster. The duo combined for 25 of the team's 44 points in the Riverside game.

Sophomore Moriah Wigley has also been logging key minutes in the Quaker Valley backcourt and has proven herself as a valuable asset — particularly on defense.

“She is a defensive machine,” Brumbaugh said of Wigley. “She is a shutdown player on defense for us.”

Senior forwards Mary Torrence and M.G. Beason are rounding back into form after being sidelined with the “bug” recently.

Torrence was out for nearly a week but came back to grab some key rebounds against Riverside.

“When you can't run or do anything for five days, it weakens you,” Brumbaugh said. “She's a tough kid.”

Beason didn't dress for the Hollidaysburg game last Friday.

The Quakers get back to Section 5-AAA competition on Thursday, at home against South Fayette.

“There's a lot we still have to work on, but we're moving in the right direction,” Brumbaugh said. “We just need to stay healthy and keep moving forward.”

Kevin Ritchart is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.