ShareThis Page

Focus on defense has Indiana girls in first place in Section 3-AAA

| Wednesday, Jan. 22, 2014, 11:15 p.m.
Brian F. Henry | Tribune-Review
Indiana's Kaitlyn Hoff brings the ball up court during a game against Mt. Pleasant at Indiana on Monday, January 20, 2014.
Brian F. Henry | Tribune-Review
Indiana's Abbey Karcher puts up a shot over Mt. Pleasant's Morgan Barlock (13) during a game at Indiana on Monday, January 20, 2014.

There are times, Indiana junior Lucy Bujdos will admit, when she gets upset on the basketball court.

And it usually leads to good things for the Little Indians.

“If anybody's girl scores, we're upset,” Bujdos said. “But if your own girl scores, you want to make up for it. You want to prove — not only to everyone else, but to yourself — that OK, she scored, but now I have to go score.”

Turning tenacious, man-to-man defense into offense has worked wonders for Indiana, which is sporting a 12-3 overall record, 7-1 in Section 3-AAA after holding Mt. Pleasant 23 points below its season average during a 50-30 win Monday night.

Whether it's rebounding or shifting into a full-court press, Indiana's increased focus on defending has led to a nine-game winning streak, one that has nullified a 3-3 start and has the Little Indians in the section lead by a half game.

“The reason we're getting so much offense is because we're playing such great defense,” senior Kaitlyn Hoff said. “We're only giving teams one shot, then we get the rebound. We're not giving them that second shot.

“We play hard defense and pressure people. They turn over the ball, so we get more steals as well. Defense has been a huge part of our success.”

Indiana is allowing 34.7 points per game, second-best in Class AAA, but that number has dropped to 30.1 points per contest during the winning streak.

Much of that starts up top with Hoff, freshman Jess Stever and the team's best defender, junior guard Abbey Karcher.

“We have three really good defensive guards who can match up with almost any team we go up against,” Indiana coach Dave Woodall said.

Offensively, Bujdos (13.5 points per game), Hoff (13.3) and Stever (11.1) have led the charge. Hoff is dishing out a team-best 2.6 assists per game, while Bujdos is pulling down 10.1 rebounds per game.

At 5-foot-9, Bujdos was a guard from fourth through ninth grade, but her versatility has allowed Woodall to move her all over the floor. Besides averaging a double-double, she's made 17 3-pointers, most on the team.

“Lucy is a matchup nightmare for teams because she's fairly tall, she plays inside, but she's made more 3s than anybody else on our team,” Woodall said. “That creates problems for people who guard her.”

Karcher, the team's top defensive player, has helped out with 2.1 steals per game, and 6-1 center Zoe Zahorchak has been good for 1.9 blocks per game.

Woodall is aiming for his seventh section championship. The Little Indians' next win — the team hosts Allderdice in a nonsection game Thursday — will give Woodall, in his 18th year, 300 for his career.

And if he has his way, the milestone win will come just like many of the others: with defense.

“Our defense has been consistent,” said Woodall, whose team is averaging 36 rebounds, 12 steals and six blocks. “We don't always shoot well. We don't always play well offensively, but I think our team defense is getting better and better every game. That really keeps us in games.”

Jason Mackey is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @Mackey_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.