Frazier, Ringgold girls pick up section wins
A few local teams took to the hardwood Saturday in both section and nonsection contests, some being made up due to inclement weather from past weeks. Here's a recap of the action:
Three Lady Commodores reached double figures as Frazier topped Monessen 56-31 in a Section 4-A matchup.
Kaley Barota topped Frazier (10-4, 3-1) with 14 points while Cassidy Guiser and Lauren Timko each added 11 as the Lady Commodores raced out to leads of 19-5 at the end of the first and 35-15 at halftime.
Terraee Bradford scored a game-high 16 points to lead Monessen (3-9, 2-3).
Both teams host nonsection games Tuesday with Frazier entertaining Chartiers-Houston and Monessen hosting Avella.
Ringgold 52,Brownsville 37
The Lady Rams outscored the Lady Falcons 15-4 in the third quarter en route to a Section 4-AAA win.
Eleni Radic and Bailey Cooper each scored 14 points and Marlena Schmidt chipped in 12 to lead Ringgold (7-8, 2-5).
Maris Seto scored a game-high 17 points for Brownsville (6-6, 1-5).
The Lady Rams host Waynesburg Central Monday in a 4-AAA matchup.
Connellsville 52,Ringgold 35
The Quad-A Falcons outscored the Rams 34-19 in the second and third quarters en route to the nonsection win.
Ringgold (2-11) was led by George Martin, who scored a game-high 15 points.
Connellsville (8-7) was led by Caleb Pittsment and Jimmy Leichliter, who scored 11 points each.
The Rams host Steel Valley Tuesday in Section 4-AAA action.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.