ShareThis Page

Shaler girls inspired by 2010-11 basketball team

| Wednesday, Jan. 29, 2014, 9:27 p.m.
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Shaler point guard Carly Harris brings the ball up-court against North Hills during a game on Jan. 20, 2014 in Ross.
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Shaler's Andi Lydon takes a shot against North Hills during a game on Jan. 20, 2014 in Ross.
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Shaler's Abbey Conrad takes a shot against North Hills during a game on Jan. 20, 2014 in Ross.

Shaler senior Carly Harris almost always has something to say — except following a 44-43 loss to Bishop Canevin on Jan. 11.

It was a game the Titans should have and could have won, Harris thought.

So the point guard spent the next two days in silence, refusing to talk to anyone until Shaler topped Pine-Richland, 56-44, two nights later.

“I guess I set my standards really high,” said Harris, a University of Maryland Baltimore County recruit. “I think anyone would. I hate losing. We lost a game we shouldn't have lost, and I never want that to happen to my team again.”

Harris and Shaler's other two seniors, Paige Quinn and Abbey Conrad, developed their win-or-else attitude by watching Val McQuade and the rest of the 2010-11 Shaler team capture the WPIAL Class AAAA title.

McQuade is now at Niagara, but her work ethic and intensity live on at Shaler.

“Obviously they were really good, so we didn't get to play with them a lot in the games,” Conrad said. “But just watching them play and seeing their passion affected all of us.”

Shaler is 13-4 overall and 6-3 in section play ahead of Thursday's Section 3-AAAA home game against Butler. The Titans won nine in a row to start the season but only four of eight since.

Far too often, especially recently, the fourth quarter has been problematic.

“We need to finish,” Quinn said. “The games we lost have been close. It's not any one major thing that we need to fix.”

Shaler leads Seneca Valley by a half-game in the race for second place with games against Butler, North Allegheny and Pine-Richland down the stretch.

Junior Andi Lydon leads Shaler in scoring at 14 points and 7.5 rebounds per game. Conrad is putting up 12 points and 4.0 assists.

Harris has been her steady self at 7 points, 4 rebounds and a team-high 5 assists, but her greatest contributions have been from a leadership standpoint, coach Neal Martin said.

“I know our young kids look up to her, just how she carries herself,” Martin said. “They watch her prepare, and I think that's something you can't teach as a coach. It has to be innate in a lot of ways.”

Quinn, the team's vocal leader, averages 10 points and is shooting 94 percent from the free-throw line.

As a team, Shaler has increased its free-throw percentage by 24 points this winter, Martin said.

“I think our strength is our passing and how we share the ball,” Martin said. “These girls find the open person all the time. There are different options out of our sets, and nobody cares on a given night who gets the glory.”

That mentality was passed down from that 2010-11 team, which knocked off Mt. Lebanon at Palumbo Center.

Harris remembers that season well and idolized McQuade, who's now one of her close friends and was that Shaler team's unquestioned leader.

“I definitely looked up to her my freshman year,” Harris said of McQuade. “The way she led the team was a prime example of why she was looked up to by everyone.

“She showed us that we can definitely have success like we did our freshman year.”

Jason Mackey is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @Mackey_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.