The Eden Christian boys and girls basketball teams had a lot in common entering this week.
In contention despite injuries to top players, both needed wins in Section 2-A games to qualify for the WPIAL playoffs.
With senior Carter Smith back after missing five games with an ankle problem, the boys (2-6 in the section) are stronger defensively, coach Todd Aiken said.
“He's our glue,” said Aiken, noting Smith is a solid rebounder and ball-handler.
Junior Carter Ehms leads the offense with 15.3 points per game.
Seniors Jeff Schmidt and Drew Helon average 10.7 and 11.1, respectively.
Ehms expects experience to help the team in the stretch. The Warriors barely missed the playoffs the last two years.
“We've been in the same spot,” Ehms said.
Several newcomers have contributed to a girls team (3-6) that is seeking its second straight playoff appearance.
Makenzie King, Grace O'Neill, Leah Bovard and Claire Wiest have played more than expected, coach Steve Good said.
“We weren't counting on them doing so well so soon,” said Good, who worried about a lack of depth early in the season.
Junior Jenna Santoro (11 points per game) and sophomore Nicole Hauskins (10) are the Warriors' leading scorers.
In her first year as a starter, junior Sarah Aiken has been scoring and rebounding more in recent games, Good said.
Junior point guard Abbie Bazzoli has struggled much of the season with finger and ankle injuries and was questionable this week, Good said.
Karen Kadilak is a freelance writer.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.