Quaker Valley wears down Kittanning in regular-season finale
TribLIVE Sports Videos
Kittanning had no shortage of tough tests leading up to its third straight playoff appearance.
The Wildcats took an early lead before the speed and depth of Class AA No. 3 Quaker Valley took its toll and sent the Quakers to an 86-54 nonsection win Monday night in Kittanning.
Chris Conlan had game highs of 28 points and 11 rebounds to lead the Quakers (20-2), who had four players score in double figures.
Noah Kunst scored 19 to lead Kittanning (7-15), and Corey Oresick added 12. Eric Hulings also blocked seven shots for the Wildcats.
“If you look at the last three teams we've played, they like to get up and down the floor, and that's what we're headed toward (in the playoffs) Friday or Saturday,” Kittanning coach Bill Henry said.
“Quaker Valley has two losses this year, both to Avonworth. Coach (Mike) Mastroianni has a great program there, and they have five kids that can shoot, five kids that can dribble and five kids that can rebound on the court. That creates problems for us with matchups.”
Kittanning did a good job controlling the pace in the early stages, and it finished the first quarter with a 14-11 lead.
Oresick had seven of his points in the first quarter, and the Wildcats exploited the size advantage held by their post players.
Quaker Valley struggled out of the gate, and it took almost until halftime before the Quakers began to move up and down the floor at their accustomed pace.
“(Kittanning) was a perfect team for us to game-plan against getting ready for playoffs,” Mastroianni said. “They have an outstanding scorer (Kunst) that can create his own shot, and their other players are big and pose problems with their size. This was a great game for us to scout, get on the bus for a long trip and get ready for the playoffs.”
Kittanning held on to its lead until Conlan scored on an offensive rebound to make it 20-19 with 4:45 left in the second quarter. That go-ahead hoop was part of a 12-2 run, after which the Wildcats would not retake the lead.
Though Kittanning only trailed 33-25 at halftime, the toll taken by Quaker Valley's deep bench was starting to show. Turnovers became a problem in the third quarter for the Wildcats, who were outscored 21-10 in the period.
“We count on our starters to play a lot of minutes, and they have 15 players that can come in and contribute,” Henry said. “That presents problems for us because we do fatigue, and when you get a little bit tired, you start making little mental mistakes. You try to use your timeouts to help, but that's just a good team we played.”
The Quakers also moved the ball well in transition. Christian Miller finished with 13 points, John Bernard had 11, and Qadir Taylor scored 10 for Quaker Valley.
“Most of this season, we've had really good starts,” Mastroianni said. “But we always talk about, because we play 10 guys, there's going to be a two- or three-minute spurt where we go on a run. This was a game we tried not to panic in.”
Both teams turn their attention to the WPIAL playoffs and the pairings, which will be released Tuesday night.
Kittanning, as a fourth-place team from its section, likely will be placed in a preliminary-round game in the Class AAA bracket, which would mean it will play later this week.
“We're going to take (Tuesday) off to regroup because we have had quite a few games in the last week. We'll find out who we have Tuesday night, and Wednesday we'll start to prepare,” Henry said.
“There are some pretty good teams out there, but we also feel very fortunate to be in the playoffs for the third straight year.
“There's a lot of teams that would like to be where we are.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.