Share This Page

Physical Elizabeth Forward girls overpower Moon

| Wednesday, Feb. 19, 2014, 11:42 p.m.

Moon has played its share of tough Quad-A teams this year — five to be exact. The Tigers even played — and beat — one of the top teams in Triple-A in South Park, so you can understand why coach Doug Saklad wasn't worried about his team being overwhelmed by physical play in the playoffs.

However, Saklad's team didn't play Elizabeth Forward this year.

And following Wednesday's Class AAA first-round game against Elizabeth Forward, Saklad's definition of physicality was altered a bit.

No. 2 Elizabeth Forward pressured Moon into 29 turnovers and held the Tigers to 24 percent shooting from the floor as the Warriors advanced to the quarterfinals for the third consecutive year with a hard-fought 53-45 win at Peters Township.

“I was just texting some coaching friends telling them that we never played a team like this before, and we've played some tough ones,” Saklad said. “We played a lot of Quad-A teams, but we never played a team that is that physical on the ball.”

By the time Moon adjusted, it was too late. Despite turning the ball over 21 times, allowing 20 offensive rebounds and converting only 14 of 29 foul shots, Elizabeth Forward never trailed.

“By one point or 21 points or whether it is pretty or ugly, it doesn't matter,” Elizabeth Forward coach Sam Kosanovich said. “I have to give it to the players because they are the ones that have to go out there and make the plays. We rely on everybody, not just one person.”

Elizabeth Forward (19-3) will play Central Valley (15-7), a 53-45 winner over Mars, on Saturday at a site and time to be determined. Elizabeth Forward, which has a 61-13 record over the past three years, eliminated Central Valley in both the WPIAL and PIAA playoffs a year ago.

Elizabeth Forward had yet another balanced scoring attack led by Alison Pastore's 14 points. Kylie Owoc chipped in with 13, Abigail Sporio had 11 points and 10 steals and Natalie Fekula added eight points, 10 rebounds and eight blocks despite spending a sizeable part of the game on the bench in foul trouble.

Moon (15-8) got 16 from Amirah Moore and 13 rebounds from Abby Unis, but it was the physical play of the Warriors that Saklad couldn't get out of his mind afterward.

“Nobody, and I mean nobody, was as physical as them,” Saklad said.

Moon freshmen Deaja Quick and Isabelle Engel combined for 10 points, but were under pressure the entire game.

“That's how we play,” Kosanovich said. “Why change? It's been working for three years. We create our offense off our defense and that's what we did and what we will continue to do.”

Elizabeth Forward got off to a fast start and led 8-0 only 77 seconds into the game and was able to expand that to 29-16 following a second quarter 9-0 run.

“How well we play is how well we play defense,” Saklad said. “Offense is typically not an issue for us because we know we are going to score. Most teams when we play that kind of defense they fold. The problem was that it never got to that point. They are really a good team and they were just better than us.”

However, Moon did come awfully close to breaking EF.

Moon cut its deficit to 38-33 late in the third quarter, but couldn't get any closer. The Tigers got within six a couple times late in the fourth but EF held Moon scoreless over the final two minutes to earn the win.

“It was a very hard-fought game,” Kosanovich said. “We kept our composure and didn't panic.”

Mark Kaboly is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at mkaboly@tribweb.com or via Twitter @MarkKaboly_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.