Obama Academy girls edge Allderdice for City championship
TribLIVE Sports Videos
Kayla Payne led all scorers with 16 points as Obama Academy captured the City League girls basketball championship with a 49-40 victory over Allderdice Friday night.
“It feels good,” Obama coach Monique McCoy said. “It feels real good.”
Tied at 19 at the break, the game remained deadlocked until late in the third quarter when the second-seeded Eagles (14-6, 9-2) used a 6-0 run to take a 34-28 lead, which they wouldn't relinquish.
Payne hit a long 3-pointer, and Obama's full-court press forced Allderdice into uncharacteristic turnovers, many before crossing half court.
“She's been hitting big 3s all year. She has been just a solid ball player for us all year,” McCoy said. “We applied our defensive pressure. We said that at halftime and that's what we did (in the second half).”
Developing a healthy rivalry over the past year, the two teams split the season series, the last being a 64-52 Allderdice victory in the final game of the regular season. The Dragons ended Obama's title hopes last year with a 57-55 win in the semifinals before finishing as runner-up to Westinghouse.
Allderdice coach Dave Walchesky said his team was better equipped to handle Obama's defensive pressure than what transpired during the game.
“The thing that frustrated me most was our difficulty handling the press (defense) tonight,” Walchesky said. “This one was tough.”
Samone Rainey added 10 points for Obama. Sierra Fordham had 15 points and Lyric Harper had 12 for Allderdice (12-12, 8-3).
With the win Obama earned a berth in the PIAA District 6-8 Class AAA playoffs, which will kick-off after the conclusion of the WPIAL playoffs.
— Justin Criado
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.