Share This Page

Indians battle, fall just short in playoff contest

| Wednesday, Feb. 26, 2014, 9:00 p.m.
Submitted
Mike Ware.

At halftime of their WPIAL Class AA playoff game, things looked rosy for coach David Vadnais and the Shady Side Academy boys basketball team.

The second half brought a sobering end to the Indians' season.

SSA jumped out to a 16-9 lead after one quarter and increased it to 33-22 at the half. That's when Neshannock (18-5) came to life and scored a basket on its last possession for a 64-63 win.

Kyle Olander led SSA (14-9) with 19 points and Mike Ware scored 18 points.

“It was a difficult loss to say the least,” Vadnais said. “We had the lead for almost the entire game. They played better in the second half but we still gave ourselves a chance to win. Every time we got a little bit of a lead, they would hit a big shot to cut the lead down.”

Even though the Indians lost, Vadnais said he couldn't be prouder of the Shady Side players.

“They played well throughout the game,” he said. “We took the ball out of their best player's hands on the last possession and they had another player step up and hit the shot.

“I feel terrible for our seniors because they deserved a chance to play deep into the playoffs.

“For our returning players, I hope we take all the positives we had this year, and the loss, as motivation to get better for a deep run next year.”

Marty Stewart is a sports editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-782-2123 or mstewart@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.