Hampton beats North Allegheny, marches on to final
TribLIVE Sports Videos
Hampton lost its lead and its momentum but found its composure.
With its 10-point lead replaced by a four-point, fourth-quarter deficit, Hampton rallied Wednesday night for a 61-53 semifinal victory over North Allegheny in the WPIAL Class AAAA playoffs at Chartiers Valley.
“We lost our composure for a little bit, but we didn't panic,” said senior Ryan Luther, who scored 25 points and will make a third consecutive visit to Palumbo Center.
After falling behind early, North Allegheny rallied late to lead 46-42 with 5:50 left after a 13-0 run that stole momentum from Hampton. But the Talbots paused, collected themselves and scored the next eight points.
“North Allegheny's pressure forces you to do that,” Hampton coach Joe Lafko said. “They continue to bring in fresh bodies. This is the way they've been successful. We know that. There are going to be those spurts in a game where you have to call some timeouts, settle your kids down and withstand those runs. That's what we did.”
After a basket by Joey Lafko, a go-ahead layup and foul shot by senior Collin Luther with 4:48 left built a 47-46 lead that Hampton then held until the end.
“I'm so proud of this team for battling back when North Allegheny had all the momentum,” Joe Lafko said.
NA's lead lasted only 72 seconds. The team went more than three minutes without scoring.
“They made some plays,” NA coach Dave DeGregorio said of Hampton's recovery, “and we made some bad plays.”
The victory takes No. 2 Hampton (22-3) to Palumbo Center to face New Castle for the third consecutive year. The Talbots were Class AAAA runners-up to New Castle last season and Class AAA runners-up in 2012.
It's the sixth time since 2006 that Hampton will play for a WPIAL title. That Talbots were WPIAL champions in 2009.
“That's our goal every year,” Ryan Luther said, “but the last couple times we didn't get it done. … We have to be tough and see if we can make something happen.”
Hampton's David Huber had 15 points and Collin Luther added 12. David Haus led North Allegheny with 14 points and Michael Carter had 12.
Hampton held NA to just five 3-pointers.
This was the third matchup this season between No. 2 Hampton (22-3) and No. 3 North Allegheny (21-4). The rivals split their two-game Section 3 series and both outcomes were close. Hampton won the first in overtime, 62-61. North Allegheny won the second, 68-62.
“We've played NA a lot of times,” said Luther, whose Talbots also beat NA in last season's WPIAL semifinals. “We know how they go in runs. We had to make the tough plays in the fourth quarter.”
Hampton had led 30-22 at halftime behind Ryan Luther's 18 first-half points. A turnaround basket and foul shot by him in the third gave Hampton its largest lead. With 6:48 left in the third, the Talbots led 35-25.
“Ryan was really good all night,” DeGregorio said.
The third quarter ended tied at 42 when NA's Cole Constantino sank a tying 3-pointer with two seconds left, erasing what was left of Hampton's 10-point third-quarter lead. In the fourth, NA baskets by Carter and Elijah Zeise gave the Tigers a 46-42 lead with 5:50 left. It was the team's first lead since 3-2.
Hampton responded with a shot by Joey Lafko, a driving layup and foul shot by Collin Luther, a free throw by Ryan Luther and a basket by Jack Obringer. The 8-0 run gave Hampton a 50-46 lead with 2:33 left.
After a basket by Haus cut the lead to two, Hampton pulled away with baskets by Ryan Luther and Huber to lead 54-48 with 1:30 left. The Talbots made 7 of 8 free throws in the final 46 seconds, including four by Collin Luther.
“We had to settle down, gain our composure, make some plays and make our free throws at the end,” Lafko said. “We did that.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.