No. 1 Blackhawk uses late run to edge West Mifflin in WPIAL semifinals
TribLIVE Sports Videos
Blackhawk coach Steve Lodovico said before the season even started that this year his team was on a mission to finish.
The Cougars (22-2) are now just one step away from completing that mission after a 68-57 win in their WPIAL Class AAA semifinal game against No. 12 West Mifflin (18-6) Wednesday at West Allegheny.
Top-seeded Blackhawk will face No. 3 South Park in Saturday's WPIAL championship at Duquesne University's A.J. Palumbo Center, start time yet to be determined. South Park defeated Elizabeth Forward, 44-40, in its semifinal game.
The start was far from perfect, but junior guard Chassidy Omogrosso finished with 31 points — 13 in the fourth quarter — and junior forward Courtney Vannoy added 17 to lead Blackhawk to the finish it has been looking for all year.
“We faced adversity and all we talked about was ‘finish, finish,' ” said Omogrosso in the midst of her celebrating teammates. “These past few years after falling short in these games, I wanted this one so bad.”
It was at this same venue that Elizabeth Forward eliminated the top-seeded Cougars a year ago in the semifinals. Blackhawk wasn't about to forget about that game.
“For me, that feeling after that game has been stuck since a year ago,” Omogrosso said. “I didn't want to leave this place again with that feeling.”
When Blackhawk senior captain Halle Denman picked up her fourth foul early in the third quarter, West Mifflin used an 11-3 run to build a 42-30 lead.
But Blackhawk answered in a big way, rattling off a 20-3 run to take a 50-44 lead, capped by two 3-pointers from junior guard Bridgette Shaffer, who finished with 12 points.
“I'm so proud of them. They came together and they pulled it through,” Denman said. “It's amazing because I know that they have my back and I know that they would win that for me, but I want to win (the WPIAL championship) together.”
The lead was Blackhawk's first since they led 7-6 in the first quarter.
West Mifflin led 31-27 at halftime. Thanks to a 7-0 run spurred by Omogrosso to end the half, Blackhawk had confidence.
“Even when we were down at halftime, we said ‘we're going finish this,' ” Lodovico said. “We knew we were going to win the game. We just had to play better defense.”
West Mifflin dominated Blackhawk in the paint for most of the game. Forwards Taylor Thomas and Deilona Devaughn had 18 and 10 points, respectively, nearly all of which came underneath the basket.
The game was impacted by foul trouble for both teams. Denman scored just two points and fouled out early in the fourth quarter. Thomas and senior guard Ciara Patterson — West Mifflin's leading scorer on the season — both fouled out in the fourth quarter as well.
Patterson finished with just eight points, half of her season average.
Blackhawk came out in the second half clearly energized, making plays that don't necessarily show up on the stat sheet.
“I think we started coming up with loose balls and rebounds,” Lodovico said. “They were killing us on the boards and loose balls. We said before the game we have to rebound and take Patterson out of the game.”
When it was all finished, shouts of ‘We're going to Palumbo!' could be heard ringing from the Blackhawk locker room.
But the girls aren't finished yet. South Park, the team that eliminated Blackhawk in last season's PIAA tournament, is next.
“We'll prepare for them in the next couple of days,” Omogrosso said. “They're a good team, and we just have to play our game.”
Gary Horvath is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.