ShareThis Page

PIHL semifinals roundup: Late surge keys Bethel Park win

| Wednesday, March 12, 2014, 10:39 p.m.
Sidney Davis | Tribune-Review
Bethel Park's Derek Lesnak and Pine-Richland's Lars Voit scramble for control of the puck during the Penguins Cup semifinals Wednesday, March 12, 2014, at RMU Island Sports Center on Neville Island.
Sidney Davis | Tribune-Review
Bethel Park goalie William Lowe deflects the puck from Pine-Richland's Andrew Vislosky (9) during the Penguins Cup semifinals Wednesday, March 12, 2014, at RMU Island Sports Center on Neville Island.

From pre-game introductions — when Bethel Park skated to its blue line as a team while each player was announced individually — until the final buzzer, it was evident the Black Hawks were in it together en route to winning a PIHL Class AAA Penguins Cup semifinal 4-0 over Pine-Richland on Wednesday night at the RMU's Island Sports Center.

“That's a tradition,” senior Chris Siak said. “It symbolizes to play as a team and not individuals.”

After a defensive struggle through two periods, Bethel Park broke through in the third, scoring three goals less than four minutes into the final period en route to the victory.

“Once we got one, I think we just kind of got on a roll,” Bethel Park coach Jim McVay said. “It was a big battle the whole way.”

Chris Siak's blast from the blue line less than a minute into the third during a Bethel Park power play started the barrage. Jake Worcester added a goal a minute later before Siak's second goal of the game came on a two-on-one.

“I just pretty much closed my eyes and shot as hard as a I could,” Siak said of his game-winning blast.

Bethel Park (19-3) took control of momentum in the second period, peppering Pine-Richland goalie Isaac Stephen with shot after shot.

Stephen made 25 saves through two periods.

“In the second, we turned it up a little bit and were winning more of the battles,” Siak said.

Pine-Richland (13-9-1) had trouble finding scoring opportunities against top-seeded Bethel Park, which had the PIHL's best defensive unit during the regular season.

Luck also wasn't on the Rams' side, evidenced by shots hitting the post twice in the second period.

“We had some chances early in the game. One hit the post and rolled across the back of the net,” Pine-Richland coach Mike Bagnato said. “Jimmy (McVay) does a really good job of shutting everything down (defensively).”

Worcester added another power-play goal midway through the third and finished with two goals and one assist. Siak added an assist to go along with his two tallies. Bethel Park goalie William Love finished with 24 saves in the shutout, while Stephen finished with 36 saves for the Rams.

“They've been scoring,” McVay said of Siak and Worcester. “They're two of our leaders.”

Bethel Park will play second-seeded Peters Township at 9 p.m. in Monday's Penguins Cup championship game at Consol Energy Center.

It will be the third game of a tripleheader, after the Class A championship between Quaker Valley and Thomas Jefferson and the Class AA title game between Erie Cathedral Prep and Bishop Canevin.

“Our goal is to play our best game each game,” McVay said.

Peters Township 6, Penn-Trafford 1 — Jonathan Dagnal scored a hat trick, leading No. 2 Peters Township (17-4) to a Class AAA Penguins Cup semifinal win over No. 5 Penn-Trafford (12-9) at RMU's Island Sports Center.

Dagnal's two goals in a 33-second span in the first period gave the Indians a lead they wouldn't relinquish.

Carter Ekberg, Gavin Rebholz and Matt Amelio also scored for the Indians.

Cam Williams scored for Penn-Trafford late in the second period.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.