ShareThis Page

Hampton gets rematch with rival New Castle

| Thursday, March 13, 2014, 10:36 p.m.
Hampton's Trace McConnell, left, hauls down a rebound over Jake Tarasovitch, middle, and teammate Chandler McKinney, right, during the first half at Farrell Area High School in Farrell, Pa., on March 13. JARID A. BARRINGER/

FARRELL — Hampton's David Huber had 15 points and three teammates scored in double figures Thursday night as the WPIAL runner-up showed its depth in a 67-45 victory over District 10 champion Erie McDowell in a PIAA Class AAAA second-round matchup.

With nine points in the third quarter, Huber fueled a 26-5 run that secured another matchup with rival New Castle in Saturday's quarterfinals.

Ryan Luther had 14 points, Joey Lafko had 12 and Collin Luther added 10, including the 1,000th of his career with a fourth-quarter free throw. But with the Luthers in early foul trouble, the Talbots at times relied heavily on their bench and three other starters. Junior guard Joey Lafko scored all of his points in the first half.

“Collin and Ryan are great players, but we had some big plays from other people tonight,” said Hampton coach Joe Lafko, who needed to use five players from his bench.

“It's the true characteristic of a good team when other guys can pick you up.”

Hampton and New Castle have met eight times in the past three seasons, and New Castle has won them all. That includes two regular-season victories this season and a win last month in the WPIAL Class AAAA final at Palumbo Center.

A site and time for this rematch has not been announced.

“New Castle is a great team,” Lafko said. “We have to play a very good basketball game to beat them. But I think that if there's one team in the WPIAL that has a chance to beat them, it's us.”

Hampton lost to Erie Cathedral Prep in last year's PIAA second round, a matchup also played at Farrell. But Hampton won convincingly this time over another District 10 champion.

Ahead by only four at halftime, Hampton opened the second half with eight straight points that led to a 26-5 run.

A layup and foul shot by Ryan Luther just 7 seconds into the third quarter sparked the run.

“Our freshness was able to create some offense from our defense,” Lafko said.

Ryan Luther sat out much of the first half with two first-quarter fouls. His second came with 1:04 left in the quarter. After scoring just four first-half points, Ryan Luther had 10 in the second and Hampton pulled away.

Hampton's lead reached 20 points after a 3-pointer by Huber. With 2:50 left in the third, the Talbots led 46-26.

The fourth-quarter lead never fell below 17 points.

Chris Harlan is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @CHarlan_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.