Fox Chapel hoops stars shine in Cager Classic
TribLIVE Sports Videos
The Cager Classic weekend began with the skills competition Friday at Highlands, and Fox Chapel's Brian Papich had to hurry to get there.
He ran in a track meet at Pine-Richland in the afternoon and then hustled to Natrona Heights.
“I didn't want to miss it,” he said. “I knew it would be a lot of fun and a nice way to close out my basketball career.”
His determination paid off as he teamed up with Ford City's Ally Kujas to win the Co-ed Team Hot Shot Contest and then finished second in the boys 3-point contest.
He also doubled up in the co-ed competition as he teamed up with Burrell's Jessica Cercone in order to fill a vacancy. They posted the second-highest score.
Teammate Matt D'Amico made it to the finals of the individual hot-shot finals and finished second as Hampton's Hayden Seserko won 36-28.
The games were played Saturday night, and Papich saved his best for last. He scored 27 points as his East team fell to the West, 112-109. Papich was named the East MVP, and his point total was the third-highest in the history of the event.
“That was a great weekend,” Papich said. “There was a lot of talent there and also an opportunity to get to know some of your rivals a lot better. It was fun.”
D'Amico finished with 13 points. He had a chance to send the game into overtime, but his last-second 3-pointer missed.
In the girls game, FC's Erin Mathias narrowly missed a double-double as she finished with 12 points and eight rebounds and her West team fell to the East, 81-64.
“It was a good time,” she said. “Everybody had fun, and it was a laid-back atmosphere. It was nice to play one more time for the local fans.”
Marty Stewart is a sports editor for Trib Total Media. Reach him at 412-782-2123 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.