Buzzer-beater lifts Quad-A girls all-stars
TribLIVE Sports Videos
When Gateway's Jada Epps and Plum's Krista Pietropola joined forces with other top senior players from WPIAL Quad-A at the Roundball Classic on April 12, their game went down to the wire against a group of stars from WPIAL Class AAA and District 10.
Quad-A was able to hold on for the victory at Geneva College.
Last Saturday, Epps and Pietropola were in a same situation as their Quad-A squad was in a tight tussle with Class AAA at the 19th annual Hoops For A Cure all-star event at Chartiers Valley High School.
Quad-A led by four at halftime, but the AAA team rallied and held a one-point advantage in the final seconds.
That's when an inbounds play from Epps to Mt. Lebanon's Christine Ehland led to the winning layup at the buzzer and a 66-65 final.
“It was an amazing game,” said Epps, who recently committed to play basketball at Bethany College.
“The AAA team was determined to beat us, but we were able to pull it out in the end.”
Pietropola said she was excited to be a part of another winning effort, despite not having what she considered her best game.
“It was such a fun game, and it was awesome to be on the winning side of a buzzer-beater like that,” Pietropola said.
“I was more of a passer than a shooter in the game and wasn't in the flow of the game the way I normally am. Even though I had a bad game, the other players picked it up, and we got the job done.”
Despite her tough assessment of her performance on Saturday, the all-star basketball season was a winning one for Pietropola, a Youngstown State recruit.
She started the run with an East-MVP performance in helping her team win at the annual Cager Classic game in March.
She finished that game with a game-high 17 points, six rebounds, five assists and two steals.
Michael Love is a staff writer with Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-388-5825 or at email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.