WPIAL revises date of Lincoln Park transfer's ineligibility period
Lincoln Park transfer Nick Aloi won't miss his entire junior basketball season after all.
On the advice of the PIAA's attorney, the WPIAL Board of Control reconsidered the start date it set for the sophomore's one year of ineligibility, said executive director Tim O'Malley. The WPIAL board had decided that Aloi's penalty would begin April 23, the date of his hearing. Now, the start date was moved retroactively to Jan. 21, the day Aloi transfer from Ellwood City.
The PIAA cautioned that use of the hearing date instead of the transfer date was not allowed in this situation and could complicate Aloi's pending appeal.
“The PIAA convinced our attorney that based on the fact that the (hearing-date option) is not necessarily in the bylaw, but something we've certainly done in the past, (Aloi) may get the (entire penalty) thrown out on a technicality,” O'Malley said. “To avoid getting thrown out, the board voted 15-1 to amend that (start date).”
The WPIAL board revised its decision by conference call, O'Malley said. The amended decision was mailed Thursday to Lincoln Park, a charter school in Midland, Beaver County.
Under the WPIAL revision, Aloi would miss the start of next basketball season, but the 6-foot guard would be available for the final weeks of section play and the playoffs.
As a freshman, Aloi was a 15-point scorer for Ellwood City. He lost his entire sophomore season to knee surgery.
In a hearing last month that lasted more than two hours, the WPIAL decided his transfer was motivated at least partially by athletics. Aloi has asked the PIAA to overturn that decision.
Chris Harlan is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at firstname.lastname@example.org or via Twitter @CHarlan_Trib.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.