ShareThis Page

WPIAL calls out Imani over security concerns following Jeannette game

Bill Beckner Jr.
| Wednesday, Sept. 27, 2017, 7:56 p.m.
Jeannette coach Roy Hall talks with officials and security after an altercation during a game against Imani Christian Saturday, Sept. 23, 2017, in Wilkinsburg.
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Jeannette coach Roy Hall talks with officials and security after an altercation during a game against Imani Christian Saturday, Sept. 23, 2017, in Wilkinsburg.
Officials leave the field during the fourth of a game between Jeannette and Imani Christian on Saturday, Sept. 23, 2017, in Wilkinsburg.
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Officials leave the field during the fourth of a game between Jeannette and Imani Christian on Saturday, Sept. 23, 2017, in Wilkinsburg.
Jeannette's Anthony Johnson knocks Imani Christian quarterback Tawan Wesley away from the ball in the end zone during the second quarter Saturday, Sept. 23, 2017, in Wilkinsburg.
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Jeannette's Anthony Johnson knocks Imani Christian quarterback Tawan Wesley away from the ball in the end zone during the second quarter Saturday, Sept. 23, 2017, in Wilkinsburg.
Imani Christian's Samuel Fairley catches a touchdown pass over Jeannette's Jackson Pruitt during the second quarter Saturday, Sept. 23, 2017, in Wilkinsburg.
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Imani Christian's Samuel Fairley catches a touchdown pass over Jeannette's Jackson Pruitt during the second quarter Saturday, Sept. 23, 2017, in Wilkinsburg.
Jeannette quarterback Robert Kennedy scores past Imani Christian's Ray Jackson (1) and Samuel Fairley during the third quarter Saturday, Sept. 23, 2017, in Wilkinsburg.
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Jeannette quarterback Robert Kennedy scores past Imani Christian's Ray Jackson (1) and Samuel Fairley during the third quarter Saturday, Sept. 23, 2017, in Wilkinsburg.

Displeased by the behavior of fans and some players, and the unpreparedness of security to handle an ugly situation, the WPIAL Board of Directors threw a few more penalty flags in response to the Jeannette-Imani Christian football game.

Representatives from both teams, and game officials, met with the league Wednesday in Green Tree for a hearing to discuss what happened Saturday at Graham Field in Wilkinsburg.

Safety, above all, was the topic of the day. An otherwise thrilling game was overshadowed.

The WPIAL publicly censured Imani's coaching staff and required the school to submit, in writing, an improved security plan for remaining home games.

Saturday's Class A Eastern Conference game was stopped with just less than five minutes to play because of security concerns. Extra police were called to the game after a half-hour delay in the fourth quarter. A fan threw a plastic bottle onto the field, hitting a Jeannette player. Officials said they felt uneasy about what could have escalated, especially when Imani players approached Jeannette's sideline.

Five Imani Christian players were ejected from the game, which No. 2 Jeannette won 54-36. The victory will stand. The ejected players must sit out Friday's game against No. 1 Clairton. No players from Jeannette (5-0, 3-0) were ejected.

“We wanted to hear from the officials as to why they let the last four minutes run off the clock, and there were very few challenges to that,” WPIAL executive director Tim O'Malley said. “It was the opinion of all involved that there needs to be improved security. We want Imani to detail its shortcomings; the bottom line is that if they're compliant we can all move forward with expectations and follow through.”

Jeannette's cheerleaders and band were sent home before the game resumed. The teams, chippy from the start, were penalized 37 times for 341 yards, 23 of them against Imani Christian.

“The biggest concern was security at Graham Field,” Jeannette athletic director Anthony DeNunzio said. “That was a major concern and one of the main reasons they had the hearing.”

Officials were complimentary of Jeannette and how coaches, players and DeNunzio handled the melee.

Imani Christian officials did not wish to comment. The Saints (3-2, 2-1) have three home games left in the regular season.

Walker suspension reduced

In another matter, the WPIAL censured Highlands boys soccer coach Brad Walker, who was accused of letting a player verbally berate an official with “unacceptable language.” The player in question was ejected from the game and suspended by Highlands. The WPIAL had asked Highlands to impose a three-game suspension on Walker but reduced that directive to one game after Walker appealed.

Highlands was cooperative and will suspend Walker for one game, of his choice, before the end of the regular season. Highlands has six games left.

“(Highlands athletic director) Chuck Debor did a great job making a case; we were going off of what we had in written form,” O'Malley said. “We relieved the three-game suspension, but he needs to sit out one game.”

The WPIAL had threatened to ban the team from the playoffs if Highlands did not cooperate. Debor and Walker spoke at the hearing.

“We are happy with the outcome and the way things were handled,” Debor said. “I have worked in different states, and the WPIAL is the best at these situations. I have a lot of respect for the way they do things, hearing people out and finding out what happened. It is a thankless job.”

Bill Beckner Jr. is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at bbeckner@tribweb.com or via Twitter @BillBeckner.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.