ShareThis Page

Pine-Richland QB Phil Jurkovec denied entry to WPIAL field hockey finals by North Allegheny officials

Chris Harlan
| Thursday, Nov. 2, 2017, 3:24 p.m.
Pine-Richland's Philip Jurkovec jumps for a first down against  North Allegheny Friday, Oct. 27, 2017 at Wright Field at Newman Stadium.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Pine-Richland's Philip Jurkovec jumps for a first down against North Allegheny Friday, Oct. 27, 2017 at Wright Field at Newman Stadium.

Five days after Phil Jurkovec's celebration caused controversy, the Pine-Richland quarterback was denied entry into North Allegheny's stadium.

His father, Jim, confirmed that Jurkovec was turned away Wednesday night from the WPIAL field hockey championships. Jurkovec had led teammates in a midfield flag-planting celebration at Newman Stadium last Friday after Pine-Richland's football team defeated rival North Allegheny, 48-28.

Jurkovec returned Wednesday with his family for the WPIAL field hockey championship, which also matched Pine-Richland and North Allegheny, but wasn't able to watch his classmates.

NA athletic director Bob Bozzuto and Pine-Richland athletic director Josh Shoop each declined comment.

In a statement, North Allegheny's administration connected the decision to Friday's football game.

“The North Allegheny School District is aware of an incident that occurred after Friday night's football game against Pine-Richland,” said the statement. “In order to ensure a thorough investigation of the inappropriate actions and remarks allegedly made by members of the Pine-Richland football team toward members of the North Allegheny Marching Band during their post-game performance on senior night, North Allegheny administration has been working in cooperation with Pine-Richland to determine the facts of the incident.

“Until the facts of the matter have been resolved, North Allegheny reserves the right to ensure that events that occur on district property are orderly and welcoming for all in attendance.”

On Friday night, Pine-Richland's players celebrated in the middle of the field as North Allegheny's band stood along the home sideline for a postgame performance. Jurkovec, a Notre Dame commit, carried a Pine-Richland flag around the field and then symbolically planted it at midfield. It was reminiscent of when Oklahoma's Baker Mayfield planted a flag in Ohio State's logo in September.

Afterward, Jurkovec said: “People might be mad about that, but I find it harmless. I wasn't trying to be mean in any way, but it's a rivalry game. If NA would beat us and they did that to us, they planted their flag at our 50, I would just say they have the right to do that because they won. It's just a rivalry game. That's what makes it fun.”

The field hockey championship was a WPIAL-run event, but the WPIAL was not included in any decision to deny entry, executive director Tim O'Malley said.

“It occurred without our knowledge,” O'Malley said. “It was certainly unfortunate and we will address it going forward. That's a situation that, had we known in advance, we would have made every effort to avert it. We didn't know about it. We found out about it this morning.”

Chris Harlan is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at charlan@tribweb.com or via Twitter @CHarlan_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.