ShareThis Page

Top performers for passing, rushing, receiving in Week 11

| Saturday, Nov. 11, 2017, 12:27 a.m.
Pine-Richland's Phil Jurkovec (15) eyes a pass downfield during their WPIAL playoff game against North Allegheny in Ambridge on Nov. 10, 2017.
Nate Smallwood | Tribune-Review
Pine-Richland's Phil Jurkovec (15) eyes a pass downfield during their WPIAL playoff game against North Allegheny in Ambridge on Nov. 10, 2017.

Top performers for Week 11 high school football in Western Pennsylvania.


432 — Phil Jurkovec, Pine-Richland (18 of 20)

280 — Drew Saxton, South Fayette (19 of 35)

253 — Zach Swartz, Washington (9 of 10)

228 — Brady Walker, Gateway (20 of 31)

212 — Kavon Morman, Montour (15 of 24)

180 — Evan Honick, Serra Catholic (11 of 24)

164 — Evan Pinkerton, Union (8 of 19)

163 — John Caldwell, Ligonier Valley (9 of 19)

149 — Ben Hughes, Riverside (10 of 16)

144 — Troy Fisher, Central Catholic (5 of 11)

142 — Brodie List, Beaver (4 of 14)

133 — Park Penrod, Avonworth (3 of 6)

128 — Cam Laffoon, Penn-Trafford (9 of 12)

121 — Luke Trueman, North Allegheny (6 of 17)

117 — Derek Johncour, Avonworth (10 of 19)

112 — Zack Rocco, CW North Catholic (5 of 8)

107 — Hollis Mathis, Penn Hills (14 of 26)


221 — Kameron Williams, Steel Valley

203 — Justin Vigna, Thomas Jefferson

155 — Nick Welsh, Washington

152 — Johnny Beck, South Fayette

131 — Jelani Stafford, California

128 — Kavon Morman, Montour

122 — Ricky Guss, Quaker Valley

109 — Cochise Ryan, California

107 — Phil Jurkovec, Pine-Richland

106 — Carlinos Acie, McKeesport

105 — Noah Harris, Riverside


263 — Jason DeFrancisis, Pine-Richland (9 rec.)

154 — Noah Plack, South Fayette (10 rec.)

151 — Brandon Lipford, Montour (6 rec.)

145 — Isaiah Shoonmaker, Washington (5 rec.)

136 — Jackson Daugherty, Ligonier Valley (6 rec.)

100 — Aaron Tutino, Ligonier Valley (5 rec.)

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.