McKeesport's Christian picks WVU
TribLIVE Sports Videos
When West Virginia told Hodari Christian it saw him as a Star, the McKeesport linebacker couldn't help but like what he was hearing.
The Mountaineers recruited the 6-foot, 215-pounder to play the Star position, a hybrid strong safety/outside linebacker.
“Once I get bigger,” Christian said, “they're going to move me inside.”
Christian gave West Virginia a verbal commitment Friday, choosing the Mountaineers over Pitt. He had a dozen scholarship offers, including Akron, Cincinnati, Duke, Illinois, Northwestern, Rutgers, Syracuse and Temple.
“I was very comfortable down there,” said Christian, who plans to major in business and kinesiology. “I thought, ‘This is the right school for me. Why wait?' ”
Christian is West Virginia's third recruit from the Class of 2013, joining Hickory running back DeShawn Coleman and Bloomfield (N.J.) offensive lineman Marcell Lazard.
Christian also is excited about the Mountaineers leaving the Big East to play in the Big 12.
“I know it's a harder schedule,” he said, “but that's going to be fun.”
A two-year starter, Christian is McKeesport's third Football Bowl Subdivision linebacker in as many years. Branden Jackson signed with Texas Tech two years ago and T.J. Neal with Illinois in February.
Those two had size on their side, but Christian was recruited for his ability to rush the passer off the edge and drop into coverage to play against the pass.
“It's a great fit,” McKeesport coach Jim Ward said. “There's a need for him down there. They need guys who can play in space and run for his size.
“With his work ethic, speed and explosiveness, he'll have an opportunity to play early.”
Kevin Gorman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at email@example.com or 412-320-7812.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.